Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34341718›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Non-invasive prediction of lymph node status for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer based on a morphological feature from ultrasound images.

Tao Jiang, Weiwei Su, Yanan Zhao, Qunying Li, Pintong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tao JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Weiwei SuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yanan ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qunying LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Pintong HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to estimate the value of a morphological feature on ultrasound (US) for preoperative diagnosis of axillary lymph node (ALN) status in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer (ESIBC).

methodsIn this retrospective work, a total of 239 ESIBC patients, were recruited, and their preoperative US images and postoperative pathology results were collected. The relationship between US images based on morphological features and ALN metastasis was investigated. The tumor circularity and US-reported ALN status were developed as a nomogram to predict the ALN status.

resultsAmong the 239 participants, 82 (34.31%) had ALN metastasis, and 157 (65.69%) did not. There was a statistically significant difference in tumors between participants diagnosed with and without ALN metastasis. The median value was 0.47

conclusionsThe clinical model nomogram based on tumor circularity and US-reported ALN status is a non-invasive approach for ALN metastasis prediction in ESIBC patients with high efficacy.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmslymphatic metastasistumor shapeultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34341718
PMCPMC8245937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.