ArticleAnnals of dermatology2021
2020 Korean Consensus Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Hand Eczema.
Article in Annals of dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Patterns and Economic Burden in Moderate to Severe Chronic Hand Eczema in the USA: A Real-World Retrospective Claims Analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- [New diagnostic possibilities in hand eczema].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Expert Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Hand Eczema in the United States.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- 2023 Consensus Korean Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis.Annals of dermatology · 2025Article
- Italian Expert Opinion on Chronic Hand Eczema: from Guidelines to Clinical Practice.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CODermatology and therapy · 2023Article
- Adolescents' Knowledge and Attitudes Related to Hand Eczema: A Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHand eczema refers to eczema located on the hands, regardless of its etiology or morphology. Despite its high prevalence and significant impact on patients' quality of life, treatment is frequently challenging because of its heterogeneity, chronic and recurrent course, and lack of well-organized randomized controlled trials of the various treatment options.
objectiveThese consensus guidelines aim to provide evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and management of hand eczema to improve patient care by helping physicians make more efficient and transparent decisions.
methodsA modified Delphi method, comprising two rounds of email questionnaires with face-to-face meetings in between, was adopted for the consensus process that took place between February and September 2020. Forty experts in the field of skin allergy and contact dermatitis were invited to participate in the expert panel.
resultsConsensus was reached for the domains of classification, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment; and a therapeutic ladder to manage chronic hand eczema was developed.
conclusionThese are the first consensus guidelines for chronic hand eczema in the Asian population, which will help standardize care and assist clinical decision-making in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic hand eczema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.