Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34341397›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Comparing COVID-19 risk factors in Brazil using machine learning: the importance of socioeconomic, demographic and structural factors.

Pedro Baqui, Valerio Marra, Ahmed M Alaa, Ioana Bica, Ari Ercole, Mihaela van der Schaar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pedro BaquiNúcleo de Astrofísica e Cosmologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Valerio MarraNúcleo de Astrofísica e Cosmologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-1579
Ahmed M AlaaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ioana BicaDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ari ErcoleDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8350-8093
Mihaela van der SchaarDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. mihaela@ee.ucla.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have a devastating impact on Brazil. Brazil's social, health and economic crises are aggravated by strong societal inequities and persisting political disarray. This complex scenario motivates careful study of the clinical, socioeconomic, demographic and structural factors contributing to increased risk of mortality from SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil specifically. We consider the Brazilian SIVEP-Gripe catalog, a very rich respiratory infection dataset which allows us to estimate the importance of several non-laboratorial and socio-geographic factors on COVID-19 mortality. We analyze the catalog using machine learning algorithms to account for likely complex interdependence between metrics. The XGBoost algorithm achieved excellent performance, producing an AUC-ROC of 0.813 (95% CI 0.810-0.817), and outperforming logistic regression. Using our model we found that, in Brazil, socioeconomic, geographical and structural factors are more important than individual comorbidities. Particularly important factors were: The state of residence and its development index; the distance to the hospital (especially for rural and less developed areas); the level of education; hospital funding model and strain. Ethnicity is also confirmed to be more important than comorbidities but less than the aforementioned factors. In conclusion, socioeconomic and structural factors are as important as biological factors in determining the outcome of COVID-19. This has important consequences for policy making, especially on vaccination/non-pharmacological preventative measures, hospital management and healthcare network organization.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityMachine LearningModels, BiologicalPandemicsSARS-CoV-2BrazilCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID34341397
PMCPMC8329284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.