Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34340720›Full record

SynthesisExpert reviews in molecular medicine2021

COVID-19 pandemic: insights into molecular mechanisms leading to sex-based differences in patient outcomes.

Ashutosh Kumar, Ravi K Narayan, Maheswari Kulandhasamy, Pranav Prasoon, Chiman Kumari, Sujeet Kumar, Vikas Pareek, Kishore Sesham, Prakash S Shekhawat, Kamla Kant and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Expert reviews in molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ashutosh KumarEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-9568
Ravi K NarayanEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.
Maheswari KulandhasamyEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.
Pranav PrasoonEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.
Chiman KumariEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.
Sujeet KumarEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.
Vikas PareekEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.
Kishore SeshamEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.
Prakash S ShekhawatEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.
Kamla KantEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.
Santosh KumarEtiologically Elusive Disorders Research Network (EEDRN), New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent epidemiological studies analysing sex-disaggregated patient data of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across the world revealed a distinct sex bias in the disease morbidity as well as the mortality - both being higher for the men. Similar antecedents have been known for the previous viral infections, including from coronaviruses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and middle-east respiratory syndrome (MERS). A sound understanding of molecular mechanisms leading to the biological sex bias in the survival outcomes of the patients in relation to COVID-19 will act as an essential requisite for developing a sex-differentiated approach for therapeutic management of this disease. Recent studies which have explored molecular mechanism(s) behind sex-based differences in COVID-19 pathogenesis are scarce; however, existing evidence, for other respiratory viral infections, viz. SARS, MERS and influenza, provides important clues in this regard. In attempt to consolidate the available knowledge on this issue, we conducted a systematic review of the existing empirical knowledge and recent experimental studies following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The qualitative analysis of the collected data unravelled multiple molecular mechanisms, such as evolutionary and genetic/epigenetic factors, sex-linkage of viral host cell entry receptor and immune response genes, sex hormone and gut microbiome-mediated immune-modulation, as the possible key reasons for the sex-based differences in patient outcomes in COVID-19.

Indexed as

PandemicsCOVID-19Epigenesis, GeneticFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansImmunityMaleReceptors, VirusSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsTreatment OutcomeReceptors, VirusCOVID-19epigenetic mechanismsevolutiongeneticsSARS-CoV-2sexsex hormones

Identifiers

PMID34340720
PMCPMC8353216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.