Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34340694›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Financial Incentives for Preventing Postpartum return to Smoking (FIPPS): study protocol for a three-arm randomised controlled trial.

M Ussher, C Best, S Lewis, J McKell, T Coleman, S Cooper, S Orton, L Bauld

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M UssherInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. mussher@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0995-7955
C BestInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
S LewisDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, Medical School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
J McKellInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
T ColemanDivision of Primary Care, Medical School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
S CooperDivision of Primary Care, Medical School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
S OrtonDivision of Primary Care, Medical School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
L BauldUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinancial incentives are an effective way of helping women to stop smoking during pregnancy. Unfortunately, most women who stop smoking at this time return to smoking within 12 months of the infant's birth. There is no evidence for interventions that are effective at preventing postpartum smoking relapse. Financial incentives provided after the birth may help women to sustain cessation. This randomised controlled trial will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of financial incentives to help women who are abstinent from smoking at end-of-pregnancy to avoid return to smoking up to 12 months postpartum.

methodsThis is a UK-based, multi-centre, three-arm, superiority, parallel group, individually randomised controlled trial, with 1:1:1 allocation. It will compare the effectiveness of two financial incentive interventions with each other (one intervention for up to 3 months postpartum offering up to £120 of incentives (£60 for the participant and £60 for a significant other support); the other for up to 12 months postpartum with up to £300 of incentives (£240 for the participant and £60 for a significant other support) and with a no incentives/usual care control group. Eligible women will be between 34 weeks gestation and 2 weeks postpartum, abstinent from smoking for at least 4 weeks, have an expired carbon monoxide (CO) reading < 4 parts per million (ppm), aged at least 16 years, intend remaining abstinent from smoking after the birth and able to speak and read English. The primary outcome is self-reported, lapse-free, smoking abstinence from the last quit attempt in pregnancy until 12 months postpartum, biochemically validated by expired CO and/or salivary cotinine or anabasine. Outcomes will be analysed by intention-to-treat and regression models used to compare the proportion of abstinent women between the two intervention groups and between each intervention group and the control group. An economic evaluation will assess the cost-effectiveness of offering incentives and a qualitative process evaluation will examine barriers and facilitators to trial retention, effectiveness and implementation. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic randomised controlled trial will test whether offering financial incentives is effective and cost-effective for helping women to avoid smoking relapse during the 12 months after the birth of their baby.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number 55218215 . Registered retrospectively on 5th June 2019.

Indexed as

MotivationSmoking CessationEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfantMulticenter Studies as TopicPostpartum PeriodPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesSmokingFinancial incentivesInterventionPostpartumPregnancyRandomised controlled trialSmoking cessationSmoking relapse prevention

Identifiers

PMID34340694
PMCPMC8327045
OpenAlexW3162107696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.