Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34340666›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Adherence to a reliable PJI diagnostic protocol minimizes unsuspected positive cultures rate.

Daniel Pérez-Prieto, Pedro Hinarejos, Albert Alier, Lluïsa Sorlí, Santos Martínez, Lluís Puig, Juan C Monllau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Pérez-PrietoDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain. dperezprieto@parcdesalutmar.cat.
Pedro HinarejosDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Albert AlierDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Lluïsa SorlíDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital del Mar - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Santos MartínezDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Lluís PuigDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Juan C MonllauDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESInstitut Català de Traumatologia i Medicina de l'Esport · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of unsuspected PJI when prosthetic revisions are thoroughly evaluated by PJI dedicated orthopedic surgeon before surgery. The hypothesis is that the incidence of unsuspected PJI is reduced by applying this protocol.

methodsThis is a historical cohort study carried out in one university hospital. The prosthetic revision assessment was carried out in January 2019. From that date on, all patients that were programmed for hip or knee revision (either by an orthopedic surgeon specialized or not in septic revisions) were scheduled for a preoperative visit with the same orthopedic surgeon specialized in septic revisions. The diagnostic algorithm applied was based on the Pro-Implant Foundation diagnostic criteria. Prior to the revision assessment, the indication for joint aspiration was done at the surgeons' discretion (non-specialized in septic revisions) and the preoperative identification of PJI was also done by a hip or knee surgeon (not specialized in septic surgery).

resultsBased on the PIF criteria, there were 15 infections among the revisions in group 1 and 18 PJI in group 2 (p > 0.05). The most interesting finding was that there were 7 patients with unsuspected positive cultures in group 1. That represents 11% of all revisions. No patient in group 2 was found with unsuspected positive cultures (p < 0.001).

conclusionA thorough PJI diagnostic algorithm should be implemented before prosthetic revision to avoid unsuspected positive cultures.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipOrthopedic SurgeonsProsthesis-Related InfectionsCohort StudiesHumansKnee JointReoperationCulture-negative-PJIPJI diagnosisUnsuspected positive cultures

Identifiers

PMID34340666
PMCPMC8330036
OpenAlexW3189390273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.