Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34340020›Full record

ArticleHearing research2021

Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation.

Raymond L Goldsworthy, Andres Camarena, Susan R S Bissmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raymond L GoldsworthyAuditory Research Center, Caruso Department of Otolaryngology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States. Electronic address: Raymond.Goldsworthy@med.usc.edu.
Andres CamarenaAuditory Research Center, Caruso Department of Otolaryngology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Susan R S BissmeyerAuditory Research Center, Caruso Department of Otolaryngology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

Encoding Temporal Fine Structure for Cochlear ImplantsR01DC018044 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI RAYMOND L GOLDSWORTHY · 2020 to 2026
$3.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants are medical devices that have been used to restore hearing to more than half a million people worldwide. Most recipients achieve high levels of speech comprehension through these devices, but speech comprehension in background noise and music appreciation in general are markedly poor compared to normal hearing. A key aspect of hearing that is notably diminished in cochlear implant outcomes is the sense of pitch provided by these devices. Pitch perception is an important factor affecting speech comprehension in background noise and is critical for music perception. The present article summarizes two experiments that examine the robustness and resolution of pitch perception as provided by cochlear implant stimulation timing. The driving hypothesis is that pitch conveyed by stimulation timing cues is more robust and better resolved when provided by variable pulse rates than by modulation frequency of constant-rate stimulation. Experiment 1 examines the robustness for hearing a large, one-octave, pitch difference in the presence of interfering electrical stimulation. With robustness to interference characterized for an otherwise easily discernible pitch difference, Experiment 2 examines the resolution of discrimination thresholds in the presence of interference as conveyed by modulation frequency or by pulse rate. These experiments test for an advantage of stimulation with precise temporal cues. The results indicate that pitch provided by pulse rate is both more robust to interference and is better resolved compared to when provided by modulation frequency. These results should inform the development of new sound processing strategies for cochlear implants designed to encode fundamental frequency of sounds into precise temporal stimulation.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsPitch PerceptionAcoustic StimulationHeart RateHumansSpeech PerceptionAuditory neuroscienceCochlear implantsInterferenceModulationPitch

Identifiers

PMID34340020
PMCPMC9343238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.