Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34339689›Full record

ReviewChest2021

Optimal NIV Medicare Access Promotion: Patients With OSA: A Technical Expert Panel Report From the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Association for Respiratory Care, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, and the American Thoracic Society.

Susheel P Patil, Nancy A Collop, Alejandro D Chediak, Eric J Olson, Kunwar Praveen Vohra, ONMAP Technical Expert Panel

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susheel P PatilDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: susheel.patil@uhhospitals.org.
Nancy A CollopDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Alejandro D ChediakDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Eric J OlsonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Center for Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kunwar Praveen VohraMBADivision of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Ascension Medical Group, Carmel, IN.
ONMAP Technical Expert Panel

Funding

Is Obstructive Sleep Apnea Important in the Development of Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG063925 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
Single Motor Unit Genioglossus Recordings to Understand Sleep Apnea PathogenesisR01HL085188 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2008 to 2018
$3.5M
Underlying mechanisms of obesity-induced obstructive sleep apneaR01HL148436 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Atul Malhotra · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
Sleep Apnea Endophenotypes: One Size Does Not Fit AllR01HL154926 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Training in the Next Generation in Respiratory ScienceT32HL134632 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL, POWELL, FRANK L. · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
Assessment of Upper Airway Mechanics Using Newer Electromyographic TechniquesK24HL132105 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL · 2016 to 2020
$611k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL132105NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085188NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148436NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL154926NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL134632NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This document summarizes the work of the CPAP and bilevel PAP therapy for OSA Technical Expert Panel working group. For positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, the most pressing current coverage barriers identified were: an insufficient symptom list describing all potential symptoms in patients with mild OSA; the 4 h per night of PAP usage requirement to keep the device; the additional sleep studies requirement to re-qualify for PAP or supplemental oxygen; and the inability to use telehealth visits for follow-up visits. Critical evidence supports changes to current policies and includes: symptom list inadequate to cover all scenarios based on updated clinical practice guidelines; published evidence that 2 h per night of PAP use can result in benefit to quality of life and other metrics; the costs of another sleep study not justified for all nonadherent patients or for supplemental oxygen due to other types of assessment currently available; and the remarkable success and acceptance of telehealth visits. To achieve optimal access for patients on PAP therapy, we make the following key suggestions: removing symptom criteria for mild OSA; reduce continued coverage criteria to > 2 h per night; eliminate the need for a sleep study to re-qualify if nonadherent or for new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services beneficiaries already on and adherent to PAP therapy; allow telehealth visits for documenting benefit and adherence; and allow PAP reports and domiciliary oximetry to qualify for supplemental oxygen with PAP if needed. This paper shares our best vision for bringing the right device to the right patient at the right time.

Indexed as

HypoxiaMedicareQuality of LifeSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSymptom AssessmentHumansPatient CompliancePatient SelectionPositive-Pressure RespirationSeverity of Illness IndexTelemedicineUnited StatesaccessMedicareNIVnoninvasive ventilationoptimalOSApositive airway pressuresleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID34339689
PMCPMC8828930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.