Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34339684›Full record

ReviewChest2021

Optimal NIV Medicare Access Promotion: Patients With COPD: A Technical Expert Panel Report From the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Association for Respiratory Care, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, and the American Thoracic Society.

Nicholas S Hill, Gerard J Criner, Richard D Branson, Bartolome R Celli, Neil R MacIntyre, Amen Sergew, ONMAP Technical Expert Panel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Reply to HatipoğluAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas S HillTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA. Electronic address: nhill@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.
Gerard J CrinerTemple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Richard D BransonDivision of Trauma, Critical Care & Acute Care Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Bartolome R CelliBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Neil R MacIntyreDuke University, Durham, NC.
Amen SergewNational Jewish Health, Denver, CO.
ONMAP Technical Expert Panel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This document summarizes the work of the COPD Technical Expert Panel working group. For patients with COPD, the most pressing current coverage barriers identified were onerous diagnostic requirements focused on oxygenation (rather than ventilation) and difficulty obtaining bilevel devices with backup rate capabilities. Because of these difficulties, many patients with COPD were instead sometimes prescribed home mechanical ventilators. Critical evidence supports changes to current policies, including randomized controlled trial evidence suggesting a mortality benefit from bilevel positive airway pressure with backup rate and updated clinical practice guidelines from the American Thoracic Society as well as the European Respiratory Society. To achieve optimal access to noninvasive ventilation for patients with COPD, we make the following key recommendations: (1) removal of the need for overnight oximetry testing; (2) the ability to initiate therapy using bilevel devices with backup rate capability; and (3) increased duration of time to meet adherence criteria (ie, a second 90-day trial period) in those patients actively engaged in their care. Clear guidelines based on medical necessity are also included for patients who require initiation of or switch to a home mechanical ventilator. Adoption of these proposed recommendations would result in the right device, for the right type of patient with COPD, at the right time. Finally, we emphasize the need for adequate clinical support during initiation and maintenance of home noninvasive ventilation in such patients.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementHome Care ServicesMedicareNoninvasive VentilationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory InsufficiencyContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansPatient ParticipationPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicUnited StatesCOPDhypercapnic respiratory failuremechanical ventilationnoninvasive ventilation

Identifiers

PMID34339684
PMCPMC8628175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.