Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34339633›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Free energy calculations shed light on the nuclear pore complex's selective barrier nature.

Atsushi Matsuda, Mohammad R K Mofrad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Atsushi MatsudaMolecular Cell Biomechanics Laboratory, Departments of Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Mohammad R K MofradMolecular Cell Biomechanics Laboratory, Departments of Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California; Molecular Biophysics and Integrative Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California. Electronic address: mofrad@berkeley.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is the exclusive gateway for traffic control across the nuclear envelope. Although smaller cargoes (less than 5-9 nm in size) can freely diffuse through the NPC, the passage of larger cargoes is restricted to those accompanied by nuclear transport receptors (NTRs). This selective barrier nature of the NPC is putatively associated with the intrinsically disordered, phenylalanine-glycine repeat-domains containing nucleoporins, termed FG-Nups. The precise mechanism underlying how FG-Nups carry out such an exquisite task at high throughputs has, however, remained elusive and the subject of various hypotheses. From the thermodynamics perspective, free energy analysis can be a way to determine cargo's transportability because the traffic through the NPC must be in the direction of reducing the free energy. In this study, we developed a computational model to evaluate the free energy composed of the conformational entropy of FG-Nups and the energetic gain associated with binding interactions between FG-Nups and NTRs and investigated whether these physical features can be the basis of NPC's selectivity. Our results showed that the reduction in conformational entropy by inserting a cargo into the NPC increased the free energy by an amount substantially greater than the thermal energy (≫k

Indexed as

Nuclear PoreNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsActive Transport, Cell NucleusEntropyPhenylalanineNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsPhenylalanine

Identifiers

PMID34339633
PMCPMC8456294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.