Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34339495›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2022

Visual Information Routes in the Posterior Dorsal and Ventral Face Network Studied with Intracranial Neurophysiology and White Matter Tract Endpoints.

M Babo-Rebelo, A Puce, D Bullock, L Hugueville, F Pestilli, C Adam, K Lehongre, V Lambrecq, V Dinkelacker, N George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Face (e)motion and the third visual pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electrical Stimulation of Temporal and Limbic Circuitry Produces Distinct Responses in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M Babo-RebeloInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Neuroimagerie de Recherche, CENIR, Centre MEG-EEG and STIM Platform, Paris F-75013, France.
A PuceDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Programs in Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
D BullockDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Programs in Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
L HuguevilleInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Neuroimagerie de Recherche, CENIR, Centre MEG-EEG and STIM Platform, Paris F-75013, France.
F PestilliDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Programs in Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
C AdamNeurophysiology Department, AP-HP, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris F-75013, France.
K LehongreInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Neuroimagerie de Recherche, CENIR, Centre MEG-EEG and STIM Platform, Paris F-75013, France.
V LambrecqInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Neuroimagerie de Recherche, CENIR, Centre MEG-EEG and STIM Platform, Paris F-75013, France.
V DinkelackerDepartment of Neurology, Rothschild Foundation, Paris F-75019, France.
N GeorgeInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Neuroimagerie de Recherche, CENIR, Centre MEG-EEG and STIM Platform, Paris F-75013, France.

Funding

Training in Clinical Translational Science: Maximizing the Public Health ImpactT32MH103213 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM P HETRICK · 2015 to 2026
$3.4M
CRCNS: US-France Data Sharing Proposal: Open science & cloud computing of MEEGR01EB030896 · NIBIB · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI PESTILLI, FRANCO, PUCE, AINA · 2020 to 2022
$651k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030896NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH103213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occipitotemporal regions within the face network process perceptual and socioemotional information, but the dynamics and information flow between different nodes of this network are still debated. Here, we analyzed intracerebral EEG from 11 epileptic patients viewing a stimulus sequence beginning with a neutral face with direct gaze. The gaze could avert or remain direct, while the emotion changed to fearful or happy. N200 field potential peak latencies indicated that face processing begins in inferior occipital cortex and proceeds anteroventrally to fusiform and inferior temporal cortices, in parallel. The superior temporal sulcus responded preferentially to gaze changes with augmented field potential amplitudes for averted versus direct gaze, and large effect sizes relative to other network regions. An overlap analysis of posterior white matter tractography endpoints (from 1066 healthy brains) relative to active intracerebral electrodes in the 11 patients showed likely involvement of both dorsal and ventral posterior white matter pathways. Overall, our data provide new insight into the timing of face and social cue processing in the occipitotemporal brain and anchor the superior temporal cortex in dynamic gaze processing.

Indexed as

White MatterBrain MappingElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurophysiologyTemporal LobeemotionfacegazeiEEGoccipitotemporal cortex

Identifiers

PMID34339495
PMCPMC8754371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.