Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34339432›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Short- and long-term mortality prediction after an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Asians: A machine learning approach.

Firdaus Aziz, Sorayya Malek, Khairul Shafiq Ibrahim, Raja Ezman Raja Shariff, Wan Azman Wan Ahmad, Rosli Mohd Ali, Kien Ting Liu, Gunavathy Selvaraj, Sazzli Kasim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Firdaus AzizBioinformatics Division, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Sorayya MalekBioinformatics Division, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-6404
Khairul Shafiq IbrahimCardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Raja Ezman Raja ShariffCardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5167-5863
Wan Azman Wan AhmadNational Heart Association of Malaysia, Heart House, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rosli Mohd AliCardiac Vascular Sentral Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Kien Ting LiuNational Heart Association of Malaysia, Heart House, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Gunavathy SelvarajNational Heart Association of Malaysia, Heart House, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Sazzli KasimCardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Universiti Teknologi MARA · MYUniversity of Malaya · MYHospital Kuala Lumpur · MYUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional risk score for predicting short and long-term mortality following an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is often not population specific.

objectiveApply machine learning for the prediction and identification of factors associated with short and long-term mortality in Asian STEMI patients and compare with a conventional risk score.

methodsThe National Cardiovascular Disease Database for Malaysia registry, of a multi-ethnic, heterogeneous Asian population was used for in-hospital (6299 patients), 30-days (3130 patients), and 1-year (2939 patients) model development. 50 variables were considered. Mortality prediction was analysed using feature selection methods with machine learning algorithms and compared to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score. Invasive management of varying degrees was selected as important variables that improved mortality prediction.

resultsModel performance using a complete and reduced variable produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 0.73 to 0.90. The best machine learning model for in-hospital, 30 days, and 1-year outperformed TIMI risk score (AUC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.846-0.910; vs AUC = 0.81, 95% CI:0.772-0.845, AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.870-0.935; vs AUC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.746-0.838, AUC = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.798-0.872; vs AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.715-0.802, p < 0.0001 for all). TIMI score underestimates patients' risk of mortality. 90% of non-survival patients are classified as high risk (>50%) by machine learning algorithm compared to 10-30% non-survival patients by TIMI. Common predictors identified for short- and long-term mortality were age, heart rate, Killip class, fasting blood glucose, prior primary PCI or pharmaco-invasive therapy and diuretics. The final algorithm was converted into an online tool with a database for continuous data archiving for algorithm validation.

conclusionsIn a multi-ethnic population, patients with STEMI were better classified using the machine learning method compared to TIMI scoring. Machine learning allows for the identification of distinct factors in individual Asian populations for better mortality prediction. Ongoing continuous testing and validation will allow for better risk stratification and potentially alter management and outcomes in the future.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleMachine LearningArea Under CurveFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsROC CurveST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionThrombosisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID34339432
PMCPMC8328310
OpenAlexW3187747520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.