ArticlePloS one2021
Short- and long-term mortality prediction after an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Asians: A machine learning approach.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing the Performance of Machine Learning Models and Conventional Risk Scores for Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Cerebrovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Evolution of Risk Measurement Techniques and Assessment of Their Effectiveness (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Pooled it
- The predictive value of machine learning for mortality risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2023Pooled it
- Machine-learning Algorithms for Ischemic Heart Disease Prediction: A Systematic Review.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic models in Southeast Asian populations with acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Predicting mortality risk in hospitalized ACS patients with hypertensive comorbidity: an interpretable machine learning approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Long-Term Mortality in STEMI Patients Using Clinical, Laboratory, and Inflammatory-Metabolic Indices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic utility of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway biomarkers in predicting outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality after Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Tools in Myocardial Infarction Prognosis: Evaluating the Performance of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- Predicting Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Recovery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome by Using Interpretable Machine Learning Models: Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Review
- Risk Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Within One Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Machine Learning-Based Time-to-Event Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Observational
- Machine Learning Approach on Predictive Model Establishment for In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Solutions for Databases With Dimensionality Reduction and Class Imbalance.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The efficacy of artificial intelligence in predicting mortality rate and cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome patients.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Review
- Risk factor analysis and predictive nomogram development for in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- STEMI-OP in-hospital mortality prediction algorithms: Frailty-integrated machine learning in older patients undergoing primary PCI.npj aging · 2025Article
- A systematic comparison of short-term and long-term mortality prediction in acute myocardial infarction using machine learning models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Observational
- Addressing myocardial infarction in South-Asian populations: risk factors and machine learning approaches.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Enhancing one-year mortality prediction in STEMI patients post-PCI: an interpretable machine learning model with risk stratification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional risk score for predicting short and long-term mortality following an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is often not population specific.
objectiveApply machine learning for the prediction and identification of factors associated with short and long-term mortality in Asian STEMI patients and compare with a conventional risk score.
methodsThe National Cardiovascular Disease Database for Malaysia registry, of a multi-ethnic, heterogeneous Asian population was used for in-hospital (6299 patients), 30-days (3130 patients), and 1-year (2939 patients) model development. 50 variables were considered. Mortality prediction was analysed using feature selection methods with machine learning algorithms and compared to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score. Invasive management of varying degrees was selected as important variables that improved mortality prediction.
resultsModel performance using a complete and reduced variable produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 0.73 to 0.90. The best machine learning model for in-hospital, 30 days, and 1-year outperformed TIMI risk score (AUC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.846-0.910; vs AUC = 0.81, 95% CI:0.772-0.845, AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.870-0.935; vs AUC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.746-0.838, AUC = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.798-0.872; vs AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.715-0.802, p < 0.0001 for all). TIMI score underestimates patients' risk of mortality. 90% of non-survival patients are classified as high risk (>50%) by machine learning algorithm compared to 10-30% non-survival patients by TIMI. Common predictors identified for short- and long-term mortality were age, heart rate, Killip class, fasting blood glucose, prior primary PCI or pharmaco-invasive therapy and diuretics. The final algorithm was converted into an online tool with a database for continuous data archiving for algorithm validation.
conclusionsIn a multi-ethnic population, patients with STEMI were better classified using the machine learning method compared to TIMI scoring. Machine learning allows for the identification of distinct factors in individual Asian populations for better mortality prediction. Ongoing continuous testing and validation will allow for better risk stratification and potentially alter management and outcomes in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.