Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34339380›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2021

Standardization and Evaluation of an Anti-ZIKV IgM ELISA Assay for the Serological Diagnosis of Zika Virus Infection.

Kanittha Sirikajornpan, Piyarat Suntarattiwong, Detchvijitr Suwanpakdee, Sutchana Tabprasit, Darunee Buddhari, Butsaya Thaisomboonsuk, Chonticha Klungthong, Yongyuth Poolpanichupatam, Rome Buathong, Anon Srikiatkhachorn and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kanittha SirikajornpanDepartment of Virology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Piyarat SuntarattiwongPediatrician, Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Detchvijitr SuwanpakdeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sutchana TabprasitResearch Division, Royal Thai Army-Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (RTA-AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Darunee BuddhariDepartment of Virology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Butsaya ThaisomboonsukDepartment of Virology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Chonticha KlungthongDepartment of Virology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Yongyuth PoolpanichupatamDepartment of Virology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Rome BuathongDepartment of Disease Control, Bureau of Epidemiology, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Anon SrikiatkhachornInstitute for Immunology and Informatics, University of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island.
Anthony JonesDepartment of Virology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Stefan FernandezDepartment of Virology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Taweewun HunsawongDepartment of Virology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THDepartment of Disease Control · THKing Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang · THPhramongkutklao Hospital · THQueen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we describe the development of the in-house anti-Zika virus (ZIKV) IgM antibody capture ELISA (in-house ZIKV IgM ELISA) for the detection and diagnosis of acute ZIKV infections. We compared the in-house ZIKV IgM ELISA assay performance against two commercial kits, Euroimmun ZIKV IgM and InBios 2.0 ZIKV IgM ELISA. We tested the assays' ability to detect anti-ZIKV IgM using a well-defined serum sample panel. This panel included 80 ZIKV negative samples (20 negative, 20 found to be primary dengue virus [DENV][ infections, 20 secondary DENV infections, and 20 Japanese encephalitis virus [JEV] infections) and 67 ZIKV reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-positive acute serum samples. The OD values were calculated to enzyme immunoassay (EIA) unts by comparing them to weak positive controls. The results demonstrated the high sensitivity (88.06%) and specificity (90.00%) of our in-house ZIKV IgM ELISA and its 89.12% overall percentage agreement. The kappa values were deemed to be within excellent range and comparable to the InBios ZIKV IgM ELISA. Some cross-reactivity was observed among secondary DENV and JEV samples, and to a much lower extent, among primary DENV samples. These data indicate that our in-house ZIKV IgM ELISA is a reliable assay for the detection of anti-ZIKV IgM antibodies in serum.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralDengue VirusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsZika VirusAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID34339380
PMCPMC8592169
OpenAlexW3189131099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.