Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34339096›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2021

Disturbance structures canopy and understory productivity along an environmental gradient.

Max C N Castorani, Shannon L Harrer, Robert J Miller, Daniel C Reed

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatial synchrony cascades across ecosystem boundaries and up food webs via resource subsidies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Max C N CastoraniDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-9359
Shannon L HarrerMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Robert J MillerMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-3759
Daniel C ReedMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3015-8717

Funding

National Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disturbances often disproportionately impact different vegetation layers in forests and other vertically stratified ecosystems, shaping community structure and ecosystem function. However, disturbance-driven changes may be mediated by environmental conditions that affect habitat quality and species interactions. In a decade-long field experiment, we tested how kelp forest net primary productivity (NPP) responds to repeated canopy loss along a gradient in grazing and substrate suitability. We discovered that habitat quality can mediate the effects of intensified disturbance on canopy and understory NPP. Experimental annual and quarterly disturbances suppressed total macroalgal NPP, but effects were strongest in high-quality habitats that supported dense kelp canopies that were removed by disturbance. Understory macroalgae partly compensated for canopy NPP losses and this effect magnified with increasing habitat quality. Disturbance-driven increases in understory NPP were still rising after 5-10 years of disturbance, demonstrating the value of long-term experimentation for understanding ecosystem responses to changing disturbance regimes.

Indexed as

EcosystemKelpForestscanopycompetitiondisturbanceenvironmental gradienthabitat qualitykelp forestlong-term experimentnet primary productivityshadingunderstory

Identifiers

PMID34339096
PMCPMC8518717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.