Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34339088›Full record

ReviewEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2021

Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions.

Susan J Prichard, Paul F Hessburg, R Keala Hagmann, Nicholas A Povak, Solomon Z Dobrowski, Matthew D Hurteau, Van R Kane, Robert E Keane, Leda N Kobziar, Crystal A Kolden and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prescribed fire is unlikely to reduce net PMProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Wildland Fire-Related Smoke PMJournal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Susan J PrichardUniversity of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Seattle, Washington, 98195-2100, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6001-1487
Paul F HessburgUniversity of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Seattle, Washington, 98195-2100, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0330-7230
R Keala HagmannUniversity of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Seattle, Washington, 98195-2100, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1952-7449
Nicholas A PovakU.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Institute of Forest Genetics, 2480 Carson Road, Placerville, California, 95667, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1220-7095
Solomon Z DobrowskiUniversity of Montana College of Forestry and Conservation, Missoula, Montana, 59812, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2561-3850
Matthew D HurteauUniversity of New Mexico Biology Department, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131-0001, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8457-8974
Van R KaneUniversity of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Seattle, Washington, 98195-2100, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0792-4850
Robert E KeaneU.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, Montana, 59808, USA.
Leda N KobziarDepartment of Natural Resources and Society, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5882-8498
Crystal A KoldenSchool of Engineering, University of California Merced, Merced, California, 95343, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7093-4552
Malcolm NorthU.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, 1731 Research Park, Davis, California, 95618, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9090-784X
Sean A ParksU.S. Forest Service Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Missoula, Montana, 59801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2982-5255
Hugh D SaffordU.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, California, 94710, USA.
Jens T StevensU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center, New Mexico Landscapes Field Station, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87544, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2234-1960
Larissa L YocomDepartment of Wildland Resources and Ecology Center, Utah State University College of Agriculture and Applied Sciences, Logan, Utah, 84322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2459-0765
Derek J ChurchillWashington State Department of Natural Resources Forest Health Program, Olympia, Washington, 98504, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3562-8194
Robert W GrayR.W. Gray Consulting, Chilliwack, British Columbia, V2R2N2, Canada.
David W HuffmanNorthern Arizona University Ecological Restoration Institute, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6547-7107
Frank K LakeU.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, Arcata, California, 95521, USA.
Pratima Khatri-ChhetriUniversity of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Seattle, Washington, 98195-2100, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4689-2027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review science-based adaptation strategies for western North American (wNA) forests that include restoring active fire regimes and fostering resilient structure and composition of forested landscapes. As part of the review, we address common questions associated with climate adaptation and realignment treatments that run counter to a broad consensus in the literature. These include the following: (1) Are the effects of fire exclusion overstated? If so, are treatments unwarranted and even counterproductive? (2) Is forest thinning alone sufficient to mitigate wildfire hazard? (3) Can forest thinning and prescribed burning solve the problem? (4) Should active forest management, including forest thinning, be concentrated in the wildland urban interface (WUI)? (5) Can wildfires on their own do the work of fuel treatments? (6) Is the primary objective of fuel reduction treatments to assist in future firefighting response and containment? (7) Do fuel treatments work under extreme fire weather? (8) Is the scale of the problem too great? Can we ever catch up? (9) Will planting more trees mitigate climate change in wNA forests? And (10) is post-fire management needed or even ecologically justified? Based on our review of the scientific evidence, a range of proactive management actions are justified and necessary to keep pace with changing climatic and wildfire regimes and declining forest heterogeneity after severe wildfires. Science-based adaptation options include the use of managed wildfire, prescribed burning, and coupled mechanical thinning and prescribed burning as is consistent with land management allocations and forest conditions. Although some current models of fire management in wNA are averse to short-term risks and uncertainties, the long-term environmental, social, and cultural consequences of wildfire management primarily grounded in fire suppression are well documented, highlighting an urgency to invest in intentional forest management and restoration of active fire regimes.

Indexed as

FiresWildfiresClimate ChangeForestsNorth Americaadaptive managementcarbonclimate changeClimate Change and Western Wildfirescultural burningecological resilienceforest managementfuel treatmentsmanaged wildfiremechanical thinningprescribed firerestorationwildland fire

Identifiers

PMID34339088
PMCPMC9285930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.