Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34339040›Full record

ReviewInfection2021

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: pathogenesis, vaccines, and potential therapies.

Ahmed M Almehdi, Ghalia Khoder, Aminah S Alchakee, Azizeh T Alsayyid, Nadin H Sarg, Sameh S M Soliman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed M AlmehdiCollege of Sciences, University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah, UAE.
Ghalia KhoderCollege of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah, UAE.
Aminah S AlchakeeCollege of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah, UAE.
Azizeh T AlsayyidCollege of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah, UAE.
Nadin H SargCollege of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah, UAE.
Sameh S M SolimanCollege of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah, UAE. ssoliman@sharjah.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-615X
University of Sharjah · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCOVID-19 pandemic has emerged as a result of infection by the deadly pathogenic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), causing enormous threats to humans. Coronaviruses are distinguished by a clove-like spike (S) protein, which plays a key role in viral pathogenesis, evolutions, and transmission. The objectives of this study are to investigate the distinctive structural features of SARS-CoV-2 S protein, its essential role in pathogenesis, and its use in the development of potential therapies and vaccines. METHODOLOGY: A literature review was conducted to summarize, analyze, and interpret the available scientific data related to SARS-CoV-2 S protein in terms of characteristics, vaccines development and potential therapies.

resultsThe data indicate that S protein subunits and their variable conformational states significantly affect the virus pathogenesis, infectivity, and evolutionary mutation. A considerable number of potential natural and synthetic therapies were proposed based on S protein. Additionally, neutralizing antibodies were recently approved for emergency use. Furthermore, several vaccines utilizing the S protein were developed.

conclusionA better understanding of S protein features, structure and mutations facilitate the recognition of the importance of SARS-CoV-2 S protein in viral infection, as well as the development of therapies and vaccines. The efficacy and safety of these therapeutic compounds and vaccines are still controversial. However, they may potentially reduce or prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection, leading to a significant reduction of the global health burden of this pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2VaccinesMutationsPathogenesisSARS-CoV-2Spike proteinTreatmentsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID34339040
PMCPMC8326314
OpenAlexW3191083929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.