Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34338965›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2021

Real-World Tumor Response of Palbociclib Plus Letrozole Versus Letrozole for Metastatic Breast Cancer in US Clinical Practice.

Adam Brufsky, Xianchen Liu, Benjamin Li, Lynn McRoy, Rachel M Layman

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04176354 (Real-world Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Palbociclib in Combination With an Aromatase Inhibitor as Initial Endocrine Based Therapy in Metastatic/Advanced Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04176354 completednot on this map

Real-world Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Palbociclib in Combination With an Aromatase Inhibitor as Initial Endocrine Based Therapy in Metastatic/Advanced Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorPfizerRan2019 to 2019Enrolled813ConditionsMetastatic Breast CancerArmsPalbociclib + an aromatase inhibitor, Palbociclib + Letrozole, Letrozole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Retrospective registry of patients with locally advanced/metastatic HRClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam BrufskyCollege of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket St., Suite 4628, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. brufskyam@upmc.edu.
Xianchen LiuPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA. Jasonxc.Liu@pfizer.com.
Benjamin LiPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Lynn McRoyPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Rachel M LaymanThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited information exists regarding tumor response to palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) versus AI alone in real-world practice.

objectiveTo evaluate the real-world tumor response of palbociclib plus letrozole (PAL+LET) versus LET alone as first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2‒ MBC) in routine US clinical practice. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective analysis included HR+/HER2‒ MBC patients who initiated PAL+LET or LET as first-line treatment between February 2015 and September 2018 in the Flatiron Health Analytics database. Patients were followed until December 2018. Real-world best tumor response (rwBTR) was determined based on physicians' assessment of radiologic evidence for change in burden of disease.

resultsOf the 1383 eligible patients who initiated PAL+LET or LET as first-line therapy in the Flatiron database, 968 patients had ≥ 1 tumor response assessment (662 received PAL+LET and 306 received LET). The rwBTR rate (complete response+partial response) in the first-line setting was 59.8% in the PAL+LET group and 39.2% in the LET group (odds ratio 2.31 (95% CI 1.75‒3.04), P < 0.0001). After 1:1 propensity-score matching, the rwBTR rate was 58.6% in the PAL+LET group versus 39.1% in the LET group (odds ratio 2.21 (95% CI 1.50‒3.25), P < 0.0001).

conclusionsThis real-world analysis demonstrated that HR+/HER2‒ MBC patients were more likely to respond to PAL+LET compared to LET. These findings further showed the effectiveness of PAL+LET therapy in the real-world setting and support the combination as a standard of care for MBC. STUDY REGISTRATION: Pfizer; NCT04176354; registered November 25, 2019.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLetrozolePiperazinesPyridinesRetrospective StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLetrozolepalbociclibPiperazinesPyridines

Identifiers

PMID34338965
PMCPMC8484164
OpenAlexW3192257709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.