Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34338954›Full record

ReviewJournal of religion and health2021

Religion in the US during the time of a Pandemic: A Medical Perspective.

Dacre Knight, Daniel V Dudenkov, William P Cheshire

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of religion and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Religion and survival among European older adults.European journal of ageing · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dacre KnightDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. knight.dacre@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6206-0680
Daniel V DudenkovDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
William P CheshireDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 80% of Americans identify as religious. As physicians caring for patients with COVID-19, we have seen both positive and negative effects of religious activity during the pandemic. Religious worship generally supports close social interaction, which provides many benefits, especially in mental health, but it can also contradict infection control measures. These forces do not necessarily have to be in opposition to each other. Herein, we present three case vignettes of religious patients who were infected with and recovered from COVID-19. We review the potential benefits and risks of religious activity in the current pandemic, as supported by the medical literature. Finally, we offer some thoughts on how to engage with patients so that the benefits of both religious activity and public health measures are optimized.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansMental HealthReligionSARS-CoV-2United StatesCoronavirusCOVID-19FaithPublic healthReligion

Identifiers

PMID34338954
PMCPMC8327044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.