Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34338941›Full record

ArticlePhotosynthesis research2021

A theoretical framework of the hybrid mechanism of photosystem II photodamage.

Alonso Zavafer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photosynthesis research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alonso ZavaferResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2600, Australia. alonso.zavaleta@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8905-1618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photodamage of photosystem II is a significant physiological process that is prevalent in the fields of photobiology, photosynthesis research and plant/algal stress. Since its discovery, numerous efforts have been devoted to determine the causes and mechanisms of action of photosystem II photodamage. There are two contrasting hypotheses to explain photodamage: (1) the excitation pressure induced by light absorption by the photosynthetic pigments and (2) direct photodamage of the Mn cluster located at the water-splitting site, which is independent of excitation pressure. While these two hypotheses seemed mutually exclusive, during the last decade, several independent works have proposed an alternative approach indicating that both hypotheses are valid. This was termed the dual hypothesis of photosystem II photodamage, and it postulates that both excess excitation and direct Mn photodamage operate at the same time, independently or in a synergic manner, depending on the type of sample, temperature, light spectrum, or other environmental stressors. In this mini-review, a brief summary of the contrasting hypotheses is presented, followed by recapitulation of key discoveries in the field of photosystem II photodamage of the last decade, and a synthesis of how these works support a full hybrid framework (operation of several mechanisms and their permutations) to explain PSII photodamage. All these are in recognition of Prof. Wah Soon Chow (the Australian National University), one of the key proposers of the dual hypothesis.

Indexed as

Metabolic Networks and PathwaysAdaptation, OcularPhotosystem II Protein ComplexPlant LeavesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSunlightPhotosystem II Protein ComplexReactive Oxygen SpeciesBlue lightMn clusterPhoto-inhibitionPhotosensitizersPhotosynthesisReactive oxygen species

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.