Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34338925›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Multidisciplinary Review of Intraductal Papilloma of the Breast can Identify Patients who may Omit Surgical Excision.

Shahrzad Abbassi-Rahbar, Stephen Sack, Kelsey E Larson, Jamie L Wagner, Lyndsey J Kilgore, Christa R Balanoff, Onalisa D Winblad, Amanda L Amin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shahrzad Abbassi-RahbarDepartment of Surgery, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Stephen SackUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Kelsey E LarsonDepartment of Surgery, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Jamie L WagnerDepartment of Surgery, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Lyndsey J KilgoreDepartment of Surgery, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Christa R BalanoffDepartment of Surgery, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Onalisa D WinbladDepartment of Radiology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Amanda L AminDepartment of Surgery, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA. aamin624@gmail.com.
University of Kansas · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to define contemporary management recommendations regarding who would benefit from surgical excision of intraductal papilloma (IDP).

methodsA prospective database from a single institution identified patients with IDP on percutaneous biopsy from February 2015 to September 2020. Categorical patient demographic, biopsy, and pathologic variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and continuous demographic and imaging variables using the Mann-Whitney U test.

resultsIDP was present in 416 biopsies, at a median age of 56 years. The median size was 0.9 cm, and the majority had greater than 50% of the target excised by biopsy. Surgical excision was performed for 124 of 416 biopsies (29.8%). Upgrade to malignancy was identified in 14 (11.3%): 8 to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 6 to invasive cancer. Upgrade was significantly associated with concurrent ipsilateral breast cancer (p = 0.027), larger imaging size (p = 0.045), <50% excised with biopsy (p = 0.02), and atypia involving IDP (p = 0.045). Age, clinical presentation, and concurrent contralateral cancer were not significantly associated with upgrade. Lowest upgrade risk (0%) was in pure IDP ≤1 cm with >50% removed by biopsy. Of 401 biopsies that either did not upgrade or undergo excision, 7 (1.7%) developed subsequent breast cancer over a median follow-up of 23.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11,41), none at IDP site.

conclusionsAfter multidisciplinary review, the management of IDP can be stratified into low- and high-risk for upgrade groups using key criteria. Low-risk group may omit surgical excision, because those patients have 0% risk of upgrade over the limited short-term follow-up.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingPapilloma, IntraductalBiopsyBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBreastFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34338925
OpenAlexW3191834461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.