ArticleBrain topography2021
Spinal and Cerebral Integration of Noxious Inputs in Left-handed Individuals.
Article in Brain topography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a scoping review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- EEG oscillations reveal neuroplastic changes in pain processing associated with long-term meditation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Is there hemispheric specialization in the chronic pain brain?Experimental neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some pain-related information is processed preferentially in the right cerebral hemisphere. Considering that functional lateralization can be affected by handedness, spinal and cerebral pain-related responses may be different between right- and left-handed individuals. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the cortical and spinal mechanisms of nociceptive integration when nociceptive stimuli are applied to right -handed vs. left -handed individuals. The NFR, evoked potentials (ERP: P45, N100, P260), and event-related spectral perturbations (ERSP: theta, alpha, beta and gamma band oscillations) were compared between ten right-handed and ten left-handed participants. Pain was induced by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the lower limbs and left upper limb. Stimulation intensity was adjusted individually in five counterbalanced conditions of 21 stimuli each: three unilateral (right lower limb, left lower limb, and left upper limb stimulation) and two bilateral conditions (right and left lower limbs, and the right lower limb and left upper limb stimulation). The amplitude of the NFR, ERP, ERSP, and pain ratings were compared between groups and conditions using a mixed ANOVA. A significant increase of responses was observed in bilateral compared with unilateral conditions for pain intensity, NFR amplitude, N100, theta oscillations, and gamma oscillations. However, these effects were not significantly different between right- and left-handed individuals. These results suggest that spinal and cerebral integration of bilateral nociceptive inputs is similar between right- and left-handed individuals. They also imply that pain-related responses measured in this study may be examined independently of handedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.