Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34338820›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

Implant removal associated complications after ESIN osteosynthesis in pediatric fractures.

Justus Lieber, Markus Dietzel, Simon Scherer, Jürgen F Schäfer, Hans-Joachim Kirschner, Jörg Fuchs

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Radial entry for ESIN fixation of pediatric radial fractures: a 10-year cohort study with focus on neurological complications.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Implant Removal Complications in Pediatric Orthopedics.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  5. [Implant Removal Complications in Pediatric Orthopedics].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justus LieberDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany. justus.lieber@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1421-0984
Markus DietzelDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Simon SchererDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Jürgen F SchäferDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Joachim KirschnerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Jörg FuchsDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
University Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeESIN (elastic stable intramedullary nailing) is considered the gold standard for various pediatric fractures. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and type of complications during or after TEN (titanium elastic nail) removal.

methodsA retrospective data analysis was performed. Metal removal associated complications and preoperative extraosseous length/outlet angle of TENs as possible causes of complications were assessed.

resultsThe complication rate in 384 TEN removals was 3.1% (n = 12). One major complication (rupture of M. extensor pollicis brevis) was documented. One refracture at the forearm occurred, however, remodeling prior TEN removal was completed. Ten minor complications were temporary or without irreversible restrictions (3 infections, 5 scaring/granuloma, 2 temporary paraesthesia). In 38 cases (16 forearms, 10 femora, 9 humeri, 3 lower legs), intra-operative fluoroscopy had to be used to locate the implants. In patients with forearm fractures, extraosseous implant length was relatively shorter than in cases without fluoroscopy (p = 0.01), but outlet angle of TENs was not significantly different in these two groups (28.5° vs 25.6°). In patients with femur fractures, extraosseous implant length and outlet angle were tendentially shorter, respectively, lower, but this did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionRemoval of TENs after ESIN is a safe procedure with a low complication rate. Technically inaccurate TEN implantation makes removal more difficult and complicated. To prevent an untimely removal and patient discomfort, nail ends must be exactly positioned and cut. Intraoperative complications may be minimized with removal of TENs before signs of overgrowth. EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryBone NailsChildFracture HealingHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTitaniumTreatment OutcomeTitaniumComplicationESINImplant removalPediatric traumaTEN

Identifiers

PMID34338820
PMCPMC9532316
OpenAlexW3190291454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.