Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34338815›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Current update on vaginal malignancies.

Rachel Stein, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan, Dheeraj Reddy Gopireddy, Ammar Chaudhry, Sindhu Kumar, Karthik Bande, Priya Bhosale, Chandana Lall

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel SteinDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida School of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, C90, 2nd Floor, Clinical Center, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA. rachel.stein@jax.ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8546-5661
Dhakshinamoorthy GaneshanDepartment of Abdominal Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Dheeraj Reddy GopireddyDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida School of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, C90, 2nd Floor, Clinical Center, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Ammar ChaudhryDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Sindhu KumarDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida School of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, C90, 2nd Floor, Clinical Center, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Karthik BandeDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Priya BhosaleDepartment of Abdominal Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Chandana LallDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida School of Medicine - Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, C90, 2nd Floor, Clinical Center, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary vaginal cancers are rare and account for 1-3% of all gynecologic malignancies. There are several histological subtypes that affect a wide range of the population. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning of vaginal cancers. This article reviews the relevant anatomy, clinical findings, imaging characteristics, and recent advances in the management of vaginal malignancies.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleVaginal NeoplasmsDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingGynecologic malignancyMagnetic resonance imagingReviewVaginal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34338815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.