ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2022
Discrepancies between self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleeping for Two: a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in pregnancy.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Trial
- Sleep Hygiene and Symptom Burden in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Clocks & sleep · 2026Article
- Sleep Disorders and Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Polysomnographic Studies and Implications for Neurorehabilitation Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comment on: "Prevalence and determinants of poor sleep quality among patients of diabetes mellitus: a tertiary hospital-based cross-sectional study".Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Accelerometry-Assessed Physical Activity and Circadian Rhythm to Detect Clinical Disability Status in Multiple Sclerosis: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Article
- Comparison of longitudinal PSQI and actigraphy-assessed sleep from pregnancy to postpartum.PloS one · 2025Article
- Characteristics and correlations of sleep disorders in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- The multidimensional sleep health of individuals with multiple sclerosis and Huntington's disease and healthy controls.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024Article
- Sleep Latency and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Among Retired Career Florida Firefighters: Evidence From the Advancing Epidemiology of Retired Firefighters Aging Longitudinally Cohort.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesSleep problems are a common consequence of multiple sclerosis; however, there is limited evidence regarding the agreement between device-measured and self-reported sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis. The present study examined the agreement between self-reported and device-measured parameters of sleep quality in a sample of adults with multiple sclerosis.
methodsParticipants (n = 49) completed a 7-day sleep diary and wore a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3×+ (ActiGraph Corp., Pensecola, FL) for seven consecutive nights to quantify self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters, respectively.
resultsThere was a significant discrepancy between self-reported and device-measured parameters of total time in bed (mean difference = 19.8 [51.3] min), sleep onset latency (mean difference = 22.2 [19.5] min), and frequency of awakenings during the night (mean difference = 12.8 [6.8]). Intraclass correlation estimates indicated poor agreement between methods on most parameters, except for total time in bed (intraclass correlation = 0.80). Bland-Altman plots suggested that total time in bed and total sleep time had acceptable levels of agreement and linear regression analyses indicated that sleep onset latency (
conclusionsOur results draw attention to the discrepancies between sleep parameter measurements and highlight the importance of including both self-report and device-measured outcomes for a complete and accurate representation of sleep in adults with multiple sclerosis. CITATION: Cederberg KLJ, Mathison BG, Schuetz ML, Motl RW. Discrepancies between self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.