Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34338435›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021

An updating approach for knowledge-based planning models to improve plan quality and variability in volumetric-modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Kenji Nakamura, Katsuya Okuhata, Mikoto Tamura, Masakazu Otsuka, Kazuki Kubo, Yoshihiro Ueda, Yasunori Nakamura, Kiyoshi Nakamatsu, Masao Tanooka, Hajime Monzen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kenji NakamuraDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.
Katsuya OkuhataDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.
Mikoto TamuraDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.
Masakazu OtsukaDepartment of Radiology, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, Japan.
Kazuki KuboDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.
Yoshihiro UedaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Chuo-ku, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-9094
Yasunori NakamuraDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.
Kiyoshi NakamatsuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.
Masao TanookaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Kohama, Takarazuka, Japan.
Hajime MonzenDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-9379
Yasumasa NishimuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan.
Kindai University · JPTakarazuka City Hospital · JPKindai University Hospital · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JP

Funding

Japanese Society of Radiological Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the dose-volume parameters and regression scatter plots of the iteratively improved RapidPlan (RP) models, specific knowledge-based planning (KBP) models, in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer over three periods.

methodsA RP1 model was created from 47 clinical intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/VMAT plans. A RP2 model was created to exceed dosimetric goals which set as the mean values +1SD of the dose-volume parameters of RP1 (50 consecutive new clinical VMAT plans). A RP3 model was created with more strict dose constraints for organs at risks (OARs) than RP1 and RP2 models (50 consecutive anew clinical VMAT plans). Each RP model was validated against 30 validation plans (RP1, RP2, and RP3) that were not used for model configuration, and the dose-volume parameters were compared. The Cook's distances of regression scatterplots of each model were also evaluated.

resultsSignificant differences (p < 0.05) between RP1 and RP2 were found in D

conclusionsThe iteratively improved RP models, reflecting the clear dosimetric goals based on the RP feedback (dose-volume parameters) and more strict dose constraints for the OARs, generated superior dose-volume parameters and the regression scatterplots in the model converged. This approach could be used to standardize the inverse planning strategies.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansMaleOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedknowledge-based planningmodel updateRapidPlanstandardization

Identifiers

PMID34338435
PMCPMC8425874
OpenAlexW3188529562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.