ArticleBioengineered2021
Prognostic marker identification based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis and associated
Article in Bioengineered, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinformatics Analysis and Validation of Potential Markers Associated with Prediction and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Research on the biological mechanism and potential application of CEMIP.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- CEMIP, a Promising Biomarker That Promotes the Progression and Metastasis of Colorectal and Other Types of Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Polymorphisms of an oncogenic gene, mesothelin, predict the risk and prognosis of gastric cancer in a Chinese Han population.Archives of toxicology · 2022Article
- Integrative analysis identifies key genes related to metastasis and a robust gene-based prognostic signature in uveal melanoma.BMC medical genomics · 2022Article
- KIAA1199: A Novel Regulator of Chemoresistance in Human Cancer Cells.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore the potential molecular mechanisms of Gastric cancer (GC) and identify new prognostic markers for GC. RNA sequencing data were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and 418 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened. Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify six hub modules related to the clinical features of GC. Cytoscape software was used to identify five hub genes in the co-expression network, including CST1, CEMIP, COL8A1, PMEPA1, and MSLN. The TCGA database was used to verify hub gene expression in GC. The overall survival in the high CEMIP expression group was significantly lower than that of patients in the low CEMIP expression group. CEMIP expression was also found to be negatively correlated with B cell and CD4 + T cell infiltration. Further, associated in vitro experiments confirmed that CEMIP downregulation suppressed the proliferation and migration of GC cells and impaired the chemoresistance of GC cells to 5-fluorouracil.Our study effectively identified and validated prognostic biomarkers for GC, laying a new foundation for the therapeutic target, occurrence, and development of gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.