Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337904›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Do trained nurses feel more psychologically safe?-Results from a multi-level modelling approach.

Melissa Seibert, Holger Pfaff, Nadine Scholten, Ludwig Kuntz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa SeibertDepartment for Business Administration and Health Care Management, Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3854-5079
Holger PfaffInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.
Nadine ScholtenInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.
Ludwig KuntzDepartment for Business Administration and Health Care Management, Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyse the associations between a nurse's psychological safety and her/his additional training.

designA cross-sectional survey conducted between September 2015 and August 2016.

methodsA multi-level modelling approach was used considering unit membership. We used data from 1,239 questionnaires completed by nurses on 75 different German neonatal intensive care units, and 75 questionnaires completed by the corresponding leading nurse.

resultsWe found the additional managerial training as a charge nurse to be a positive predictor for psychological safety (β = .346, p ≤ .05). Surprisingly, the additional clinical training in paediatric intensive care is negatively associated with psychological safety (β = -.192, p ≤ .01). Our model estimates that this negative association can be inhibited if the team's share of nurses with an additional clinical training increases (β = .313, p ≤ .05).

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalNursesChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornSurveys and Questionnairesadditional trainingmultilevel modellingneonatal intensive careneonatal intensive care unitnursingprofessional educationpsychological safetyteam structure

Identifiers

PMID34337904
PMCPMC8510784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.