Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337527›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2021

Pigtail Suture Stents Significantly Reduce Stent-related Symptoms Compared to Conventional Double J Stents: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Andrea Bosio, Eugenio Alessandria, Simone Agosti, Federico Vitiello, Eugenia Vercelli, Alessandro Bisconti, Paolo Piana, Fabrizio Fop, Paolo Gontero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03344120 (Comparison Between Symptomps Related to Pigtail Suture Stent Versus Conventional Double J After Ureterorenoscopy for Stone Treatment. A Prospective Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03344120 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison Between Symptomps Related to Pigtail Suture Stent Versus Conventional Double J After Ureterorenoscopy for Stone Treatment. A Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorA.O.U. Città della Salute e della ScienzaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled84ConditionsSymptoms and Signs, Pain, Ureteral CalculiArmsAdministration of USSQ Symptoms questionnaire after stent positioning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Design of a fully intraureteral stent and proof-of-conceptTranslational andrology and urology · 2022
    Article
  20. Silicone vs. Polyurethane Stent: The Final Countdown.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea BosioDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Eugenio AlessandriaDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Simone AgostiDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Federico VitielloDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Eugenia VercelliDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro BiscontiDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Paolo PianaDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Fabrizio FopDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Paolo GonteroDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Fondazione Ricerca Molinette · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDouble J (DJ) ureteral stents are commonly inserted after ureteroscopy (URS) procedures for stone treatment. However, stent-related symptoms are still a major issue.

objectiveTo determine whether a commercially available pigtail suture stent (PSS) can reduce stent-related symptoms compared to a conventional DJ stent after uncomplicated URS. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsWe designed a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group trial from January to November 2020. The inclusion criteria were stone-free URS without intraprocedural complications. Patients with distal ureteral stones were excluded.

interventionInsertion of a PSS or DJ stent after URS. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was the Urinary Symptom Index score on the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) 2 wk after URS. Secondary endpoints were USSQ domain scores and responses to individual USSQ questions at 2 d and 2 wk after surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 78 patients were randomized and treated according to protocol. The Urinary Symptom Index score (

conclusionsPSS significantly reduced stent-related symptoms after URS, in particular urinary symptoms and pain, compared to conventional DJ stents, and showed a good safety profile. PATIENT SUMMARY: Stents are hollow tubes placed in the passage between the kidney and the bladder (ureter). The standard stent has two coiled ends (double J stent) to keep it in place in both the kidney and the bladder. We tested a commercial stent with two strings at the bladder end (pigtail suture stent) after procedures to remove stones from the upper urinary tract and found that it caused less stent-related symptoms compared to a double J stent.

This trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03344120.

Indexed as

Double J stentLower urinary tract symptomsNephrolithiasisPainPigtail suture stentsRIRSStent-related symptomsStentsUreteroscopyUrinary calculiURS

Identifiers

PMID34337527
PMCPMC8317849
OpenAlexW3160607031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.