ArticleEuropean urology open science2021
Can a Dinosaur Think? Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
Article in European urology open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of artificial intelligence algorithms in ultrasound-based kidney stone detection, classification, prediction, and management: a systematic review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Current state of AI for shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review from YAU and EAU endourology.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in urolithiasis: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Predicting extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success with a machine learning nomogram: A pilot study.Central European journal of urology · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics in urology - molecular characterization of pathophysiology and response to treatment.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
- Transforming urinary stone disease management by artificial intelligence-based methods: A comprehensive review.Asian journal of urology · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence-aided ultrasound in renal diseases: a systematic review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Review
- Predictors of stone-free rate after a single-session extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for a single kidney stone measuring 10 to 20 mm: A private center experience.Current urology · 2023Article
- The Lifetime History of the First Italian Public Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Lithotripter as a Mirror of the Evolution of Endourology over the Last Decade.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence implementation in ESWL.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of kidney stones is losing ground to more expensive and invasive endoscopic treatments.
objectiveThis proof-of-concept project was initiated to develop artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented ESWL and to investigate the potential for machine learning to improve the efficacy of ESWL. DESIGN SETTING AND
participantsTwo-dimensional ultrasound videos were captured during ESWL treatments from an inline ultrasound device with a video grabber. An observer annotated 23 212 images from 11 patients as either in or out of focus. The median hit rate was calculated on a patient level via bootstrapping. A convolutional neural network with U-Net architecture was trained on 57 ultrasound images with delineated kidney stones from the same patients annotated by a second observer. We tested U-Net on the ultrasound images annotated by the first observer. Cross-validation with a training set of nine patients, a validation set of one patient, and a test set of one patient was performed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Classical metrics describing classifier performance were calculated, together with an estimation of how the algorithm would affect shock wave hit rate. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median hit rate for standard ESWL was 55.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43.2-67.3%). The performance metrics for U-Net were accuracy 63.9%, sensitivity 56.0%, specificity 74.7%, positive predictive value 75.3%, negative predictive value 55.2%, Youden's
conclusionsOur calculated ESWL hit rate of 55.2% (95% CI 43.2-67.3%) supports findings from earlier research. We have demonstrated that a machine learning algorithm trained on just 11 patients increases the hit rate to 75.3% and reduces mishits by 67.1%. When U-Net is trained on more and higher-quality annotations, even better results can be expected. PATIENT SUMMARY: Kidney stones can be treated by applying shockwaves to the outside of the body. Ultrasound scans of the kidney are used to guide the machine delivering the shockwaves, but the shockwaves can still miss the stone. We used artificial intelligence to improve the accuracy in hitting the stone being treated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.