Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337515›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2021

Can a Dinosaur Think? Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Sebastien Muller, Håkon Abildsnes, Andreas Østvik, Oda Kragset, Inger Gangås, Harriet Birke, Thomas Langø, Carl-Jørgen Arum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastien MullerDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Håkon AbildsnesMedical School, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Andreas ØstvikDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Oda KragsetMedical School, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Inger GangåsDepartment of Radiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Harriet BirkeDepartment of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Thomas LangøDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Carl-Jørgen ArumDepartment of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
SINTEF · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOLund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of kidney stones is losing ground to more expensive and invasive endoscopic treatments.

objectiveThis proof-of-concept project was initiated to develop artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented ESWL and to investigate the potential for machine learning to improve the efficacy of ESWL. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsTwo-dimensional ultrasound videos were captured during ESWL treatments from an inline ultrasound device with a video grabber. An observer annotated 23 212 images from 11 patients as either in or out of focus. The median hit rate was calculated on a patient level via bootstrapping. A convolutional neural network with U-Net architecture was trained on 57 ultrasound images with delineated kidney stones from the same patients annotated by a second observer. We tested U-Net on the ultrasound images annotated by the first observer. Cross-validation with a training set of nine patients, a validation set of one patient, and a test set of one patient was performed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Classical metrics describing classifier performance were calculated, together with an estimation of how the algorithm would affect shock wave hit rate. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median hit rate for standard ESWL was 55.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43.2-67.3%). The performance metrics for U-Net were accuracy 63.9%, sensitivity 56.0%, specificity 74.7%, positive predictive value 75.3%, negative predictive value 55.2%, Youden's

conclusionsOur calculated ESWL hit rate of 55.2% (95% CI 43.2-67.3%) supports findings from earlier research. We have demonstrated that a machine learning algorithm trained on just 11 patients increases the hit rate to 75.3% and reduces mishits by 67.1%. When U-Net is trained on more and higher-quality annotations, even better results can be expected. PATIENT SUMMARY: Kidney stones can be treated by applying shockwaves to the outside of the body. Ultrasound scans of the kidney are used to guide the machine delivering the shockwaves, but the shockwaves can still miss the stone. We used artificial intelligence to improve the accuracy in hitting the stone being treated.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceExtracorporeal shockwave lithotripsyKidney stonesMachine learningNeural network

Identifiers

PMID34337515
PMCPMC8317850
OpenAlexW3137103617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.