Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337513›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology open science2021

Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Where Are We Now? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.

Giulia Marvaso, Stefania Volpe, Matteo Pepa, Matteo Augugliaro, Giulia Corrao, Annalisa Biffi, Mattia Zaffaroni, Luca Bergamaschi, Francesco Maria La Fauci, Francesco Alessandro Mistretta and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia MarvasoDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Stefania VolpeDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Matteo PepaDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Matteo AugugliaroDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giulia CorraoDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Annalisa BiffiNational Centre of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Mattia ZaffaroniDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Luca BergamaschiDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Francesco Maria La FauciDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Francesco Alessandro MistrettaDepartment of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Stefano LuzzagoDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Federica CattaniUnit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Gennaro MusiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe PetraliaDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gabriella PravettoniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Ottavio De CobelliDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Roberto OrecchiaScientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Barbara Alicja Jereczek-FossaDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe optimal management of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is still debated.

objectiveThe purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to collect the available evidence to date to better define the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in selected patients with oligorecurrent PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Study methodology complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). All prospective studies including PCa patients with nodal and/or bone oligometastases (one to five lesions) were considered eligible. Heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was tested using chi-square statistics and measured with the I EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, six works (two randomized and the remainder observational) published between 2013 and 2020 were considered eligible. Globally, data from 445 patients were incorporated, of whom 396 were treated with SBRT (329 in observational studies and the remaining 67 in randomized ones). Regarding local progression-free survival (PFS), five studies reported values close to 100%, while one reported a value of 80% in the observation arm. The benefit in terms of biochemical PFS brought by SBRT was evident in all considered studies. Such a difference in cumulative probabilities between the intervention arm and the comparator arm is maintained even 24 mo after the baseline. All studies but one considered toxicity among the endpoints of interest. Most events were classified as either G1 or G2, and the only G ≥ 3 adverse event was reported in one trial.

conclusionsSBRT is highly cost effective, safe, and with an almost inexistent toxicity risk that makes it the perfect candidate for the optimal management of PCa oligometastatic patients. However, more solid data and a higher level of evidence are needed to affirm its role in the management of these patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this work, we reviewed available evidence on the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in treating oligometastatic prostate cancer patients. We found good evidence that radiotherapy brings important benefits in overall treatment efficacy without major side effects.

Indexed as

Meta-analysisMetastasis-directed therapyOligometastasesProstate cancerStereotactic body radiotherapySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34337513
PMCPMC8317806
OpenAlexW3136016043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.