Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337500›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2021

WATER versus WATER II 2-Year Update: Comparing Aquablation Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in 30-80-cm

David-Dan Nguyen, Neil Barber, Mo Bidair, Peter Gilling, Paul Anderson, Kevin C Zorn, Gopal Badlani, Mitch Humphreys, Steven Kaplan, Ronald Kaufman and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 5 countries.

David-Dan NguyenFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Neil BarberDepartment of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley, UK.
Mo BidairSan Diego Clinical Trials, San Diego, CA, USA.
Peter GillingDepartment of Urology, Bay of Plenty District Health Board Clinical School, Tauranga, New Zealand.
Paul AndersonDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Kevin C ZornDivision of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Gopal BadlaniDepartment of Urology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Mitch HumphreysDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Steven KaplanDepartment of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Ronald KaufmanDivision of Urology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Alan SoUrologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ryan PatersonUrologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Larry GoldenbergUrologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Dean EltermanDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mihir DesaiUSC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jim LingemanInstitute for Kidney Stone Disease, Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Claus RoehrbornDepartment of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA.
Naeem BhojaniDivision of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USFrimley Park Hospital · GBHouston Methodist · USLos Angeles Clinical Trials · USMcGill University · CAMount Sinai Hospital · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUrology Bay of Plenty · NZWake Forest University · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical options are limited when treating large (>80 cm

objectiveTo compare the outcome of Aquablation for 30-80-cm DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsWe used data from two trials. WATER is a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, international clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of Aquablation and transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of LUTS/BPH in men aged 45-80 yr with a prostate of 30-80 cm

interventionAquablation, an ultrasound-guided, robotically executed waterjet ablative procedure. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We compared 24-mo outcomes between 116 WATER and 101 WATER II study subjects. Student's RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) reductions at 24 mo was 14.5 points for WATER and 17.4 points for WATER II (

conclusionsAquablation is effective in patients with a prostate of 30-80 cm PATIENT SUMMARY: Outcomes of Aquablation for both small-to-moderately-sized and large prostates are similar and sustainable at 2 yr of follow-up.

Indexed as

AquablationBenign prostatic hyperplasiaRobotics

Identifiers

PMID34337500
PMCPMC8317818
OpenAlexW3128109365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.