Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337453›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2020

A Prospective, Observational, Multicentre Study Concerning Nontechnical Skills in Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy.

Alexander J W Beulens, Willem M Brinkman, Evert L Koldewijn, Ad J M Hendrikx, Jean Paul A van Basten, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer, Henk G Van der Poel, Chris H Bangma, Cordula Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander J W BeulensNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem M BrinkmanDepartment of Oncological Urology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Evert L KoldewijnDepartment of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ad J M HendrikxDepartment of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jean Paul A van BastenDepartment of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J G van MerriënboerSchool of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Henk G Van der PoelDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris H BangmaDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cordula WagnerNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesesvaluation of surgical skills, both technical and nontechnical, is possible through observations and video analysis. Besides technical failures, adverse outcomes in surgery can also be related to hampered communication, moderate teamwork, lack of leadership, and loss of situational awareness. Even though some surgeons are convinced about nontechnical skills being an important part of their professionalisation, there is paucity of data about a possible relationship between nontechnical skills and surgical outcome. In robot-assisted surgery, the surgeon sits behind the console and is at a remote position from the surgical field and team, making communication more important than in open surgery and conventional laparoscopy. A lack of structured research makes it difficult to assess the value of the different analysis methods for nontechnical skills, particularly in robot-assisted surgery. Our hypothesis includes the following: (1) introduction of robot-assisted surgery leads to an initial decay in nontechnical skills behaviour during the learning curve of the team, (2) nontechnical skills behaviour is more explicitly expressed in experienced robot-assisted surgery teams than in experienced open surgery teams, and (3) introduction of robot-assisted surgery leads to the development of different forms of nontechnical skills behaviour compared with open surgery.

designThis study is a prospective, observational, multicentre, nonrandomised, case-control study including bladder cancer patients undergoing either an open radical cystectomy or a robot-assisted radical cystectomy at the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands, or at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam. All patients are eligible for inclusion; there are no exclusion criteria. The Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands, performs on average 35 radical cystectomies a year. The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam, performs on average 100 radical cystectomies a year. PROTOCOL OVERVIEW: The choice of treatment is at the discretion of the patient and the surgeon. Patient results will be obtained prospectively. Pathology results as well as complications occurring within 90 d following surgery will be registered. Surgical complications will be registered according to the Clavien-Dindo system. MEASUREMENTS: Nontechnical skills will be observed using five different methods: (1) NOTSS: Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons; (2) Oxford NOTECHS II: a modified theatre team nontechnical skills scoring system; (3) OTAS: Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery; (4) Interpersonal and Cognitive Assessment for Robotic Surgery (ICARS): evaluation of nontechnical skills in robotic surgery; and (5) analysis of human factors. Technical skills in robot-assisted radical cystectomy will be analysed using two different methods: (1) GEARS: Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skill and (2) GERT: Generic Error Rating Tool. SAFETY CRITERIA AND REPORTING: Formal ethical approval has been provided by Medical research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U), The Netherlands (reference number W19.048). We hope to present the results of this study to the scientific community at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Frequency statistics will be calculated for patient demographical data, and a Shapiro-Wilk test with SUMMARY: This study uses a structured approach to the analysis of nontechnical skills using extracorporeal videos of both open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical cystectomy surgeries, in order to obtain detailed data on nontechnical skills during open and minimally invasive surgeries. The results of this study could possibly be used to develop team-training programmes, specifically for the introduction of the surgical robot in relation to changes in nontechnical skills. Additional analysis of technical skills using the intracorporeal footage of the surgical robot will be used to elucidate the role of surgical skills and surgical events in nontechnical skills.

Indexed as

CystectomyNontechnical skillsOutcomeRobot-assisted surgerySurgical skills

Identifiers

PMID34337453
PMCPMC8317860
OpenAlexW3038821056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.