Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337385›Full record

ArticleToxicon: X2021

Dealing with snakebite in rural Cameroon: A qualitative investigation among victims and traditional healers.

Manon Chuat, Gabriel Alcoba, Justin Eyong, Franck Wanda, Eric Comte, Armand Nkwescheu, François Chappuis, Patricia Hudelson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicon: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Examining the Role of Treatment-seeking Behavior in Snakebite Mortality: A Narrative Review.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manon ChuatFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gabriel AlcobaDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Justin EyongCentre International de Recherches, D'Enseignements et de Soins en Milieu Tropical (CIRES), CIRES BP 11, Akonolinga, Akonolinga, Cameroon.
Franck WandaCentre International de Recherches, D'Enseignements et de Soins en Milieu Tropical (CIRES), CIRES BP 11, Akonolinga, Akonolinga, Cameroon.
Eric ComteCentre International de Recherches, D'Enseignements et de Soins en Milieu Tropical (CIRES), CIRES BP 11, Akonolinga, Akonolinga, Cameroon.
Armand NkwescheuCameroon Society of Epidemiology (CaSE), Yaoundé, BP, 1411, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
François ChappuisDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Patricia HudelsonDepartment of Primary Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CHUniversité de Yaoundé I · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnakebite is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) affecting rural and remote populations globally, who are additionally burdened by poverty and the lack of effective healthcare systems. Delayed healthcare and use of traditional treatments are very frequent. The purpose of our study was to explore perceptions of snakes, impact of snakebite, and knowledge and opinions of different snakebite treatments with the aim of identifying opportunities for improving snakebite management.

methodsThis is a qualitative descriptive study based on semi-structured interviews with 21 snakebite victims and 4 traditional healers in 4 villages of Akonolinga health district, Center Region, Cameroon. Analysis focused on describing participants' perceptions of snakes, the impact of snakebite on the victims' lives, and their opinions of different treatment options.

resultsRespondents were fearful of snakes and knowledgeable about envenoming symptoms and treatments. The experience of snakebite led to increased vigilance and avoidance behaviours, which sometimes resulted in financial loss for the victims. A range of traditional treatments were described, including tourniquets, black-stone application and medicinal plant decoctions. However, opinions were ambivalent regarding their efficacy, depending especially on previous personal experiences. Still, traditional treatments were said to be more available and cheaper than hospital care, and in particular, than antivenom. Nevertheless, most victims preferred hospital treatment if the financial and transportation barriers were lifted. Both snakebite victims and traditional healers were of the opinion that collaboration between health services and traditional healers could help to improve snakebite management and outcomes.

conclusionOur study shows that snakebite victims are in favour of using antivenom for the treatment of snakebite and would welcome better access to it. However, its current unavailability and high cost pushes them to turn to traditional treatments. On the other hand, traditional healers are in favour of collaborating with health facilities. These results are very encouraging for the improvement of snakebite management in Cameroon along the lines of the WHO Snakebite Envenoming Strategy for Prevention and Control: ensuring access to safe and effective treatment, and increasing partnership and coordination between communities, traditional healers, and conventional caregivers.

Indexed as

Access barriersAntivenomCameroonComité National d’Ethique de la Recherche sur la Santé Humaine, (CNERSH)Commission Cantonale d’Ethique de la Recherche scientifique, (CCER)Neglected tropical disease, (NTD)Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, (PTSD)QualitativeSnakebiteTraditional healerWorld Health Organization, (WHO)

Identifiers

PMID34337385
PMCPMC8313737
OpenAlexW3186741252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.