ArticleiScience2021
Base editing-coupled survival screening enabled high-sensitive analysis of PAM compatibility and finding of the new possible off-target.
Article in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biodegradation of polyurethane by the microbial consortia enriched from landfill.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Base editing (BE) is a promising genome engineering tool for modifying DNA or RNA and has been widely used in various microorganisms as well as eukaryotic cells. Despite the proximal protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) is critical to the targeting range and off-target effect of BE, there is still lack of a specific approach to analyze the PAM pattern in BE systems. Here, we developed a base editing-coupled survival screening method. Using dCas9 from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.