Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337300›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2021

Impact of preoperative muscle quality on postoperative severe complications after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.

Ryota Matsui, Noriyuki Inaki, Toshikatsu Tsuji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Preoperative PD-1Oncology letters · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryota MatsuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital Kanazawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0541-2357
Noriyuki InakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital Kanazawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4241-5015
Toshikatsu TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital Kanazawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3430-0568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative sarcopenia is an important risk factor for postoperative complications in patients with gastric cancer. However, the relationship between muscle quality and postoperative complications in patients with gastric cancer is inadequately studied. Therefore, we investigated the impact of preoperative muscle quality on severe postoperative complications after radical gastrectomy.

methodsA total of 840 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for p-stages I-III primary gastric cancer between April 2008 and June 2018 with preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and body composition analysis were included. We measured intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) as an indicator of muscle quality. A higher IMAC signified a poorer quality. All statistical analyses were performed with EZR, and a

resultsThe low-IMAC and high-IMAC groups had 422 (50.2%) and 418 (49.8%) patients, respectively. The latter were older (

conclusionsPoor preoperative muscle quality is an independent risk factor for severe postoperative complications after radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

Indexed as

gastric cancerintramuscular adipose tissue contentmuscle qualitypostoperative severe complication

Identifiers

PMID34337300
PMCPMC8316729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.