Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337160›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2021

Toxic elements in follicular fluid adversely influence the likelihood of pregnancy and live birth in women undergoing IVF.

Celeste D Butts, Michael S Bloom, Alexandra McGough, Nikolaus Lenhart, Rebecca Wong, Evelyn Mok-Lin, Patrick J Parsons, Aubrey L Galusha, Richard W Browne, Recai M Yucel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Occupational and environmental mercury exposure and human reproductive health - a review.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Heavy metals and metalloids exposure andFrontiers in reproductive health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Celeste D ButtsDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
Michael S BloomDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0028-5494
Alexandra McGoughDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nikolaus LenhartDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rebecca WongDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Evelyn Mok-LinDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Patrick J ParsonsDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
Aubrey L GalushaDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
Richard W BrowneDepartment of Biotechnical and Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Recai M YucelDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Beth J FeingoldDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
Victor Y FujimotoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USNew York State Department of Health · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · USGeorge Mason University · USTemple University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Wadsworth Center's Human Health and Exposure Analysis Resource (WC-HHEAR)U2CES026542 · NIEHS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI KANNAN, KURUNTHACHALAM, KANNAN, KURUNTHACHALAM · 2015 to 2025
$15.6M
Study of Metals and Assisted Reproductive Technologies(SMART)R56ES023886 · NIEHS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI BLOOM, MICHAEL S · 2015 to 2015
$303k
NIEHS NIH HHS R56 ES023886NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionAre follicular fluid (FF), arsenic (As), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) concentrations associated with IVF outcomes among women undergoing IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: There was a non-linear association between higher FF Hg concentration and a lower likelihood of biochemical pregnancy and live birth. Higher FF Pb concentration was also associated with a lower probability of live birth. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous research suggests that toxic elements may affect fertility among couples conceiving with and without assistance. However, the results have been inconsistent, possibly related in part to exposure misclassification. Very few studies have used ovarian FF to measure toxic elements, as it requires an invasive collection procedure, yet it may offer a more accurate estimate of a biologically effective dose than blood or urine. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This is a prospective study of 56 women undergoing IVF, from October 2015 to June 2017. FF was collected for analysis on the day of oocyte retrieval. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsAs, Cd, Hg and Pb were determined in 197 FF specimens, using inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry. FF glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, total glutathione-S-transferase, superoxide dismutase, arylesterase and paraoxonase (PON1p) activities were measured using kinetic enzyme assays. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Non-linear associations were detected, in which the probabilities of biochemical pregnancy ( LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The results should be interpreted judiciously given the limited sample size and difficulty accounting for correlated data in generalized additive models and mediation analyses. Additionally, women undergoing IVF are highly selected with respect to age and socioeconomic status, and so the generalizability of the results may be limited. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsOverall, the results suggest that FF Hg was associated with a lower likelihood of biochemical pregnancy and live birth, with a potential threshold effect, and that higher FF Pb was associated with a lower probability of live birth. These results may help to guide clinical recommendations for limiting the exposure of patients to Hg and Pb and ultimately improve IVF success rates. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was funded in part by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), grant number 1R56ES023886-01, to the University at Albany (M.S.B.), and in part by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), grant number 1U2CES026542-01, to the Wadsworth Center (P.J.P.). The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

antioxidant enzymesbiomarkersfollicular fluidIVFleadlive birthmercurypregnancytoxic elements

Identifiers

PMID34337160
PMCPMC8318822
OpenAlexW3192018943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.