Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34337135›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Knowledge assessment and psychological impact of genetic counseling in people at risk for familial FTD.

Bonnie Wong, Diane Lucente, Samantha Krivensky, Erin Krahn, Jason Karlawish, Bradford C Dickerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bonnie WongDepartments of Neurology and Psychiatry Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-3009
Diane LucenteDepartments of Neurology and Psychiatry Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Boston Massachusetts USA.
Samantha KrivenskyDepartments of Neurology and Psychiatry Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Boston Massachusetts USA.
Erin KrahnDepartments of Neurology and Psychiatry Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Boston Massachusetts USA.
Jason KarlawishPenn Memory Center & Division of Geriatrics Departments of Medicine Medical Ethics and Health Policy and Neurology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Bradford C DickersonDepartments of Neurology and Psychiatry Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Boston Massachusetts USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STEVEN E ARNOLD · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072979 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVID A WOLK · 2021 to 2026
$24.8M
Pilot study of preclinical and prodromal frontotemporal degenerationR21NS084156 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DICKERSON, BRADFORD C · 2013 to 2014
$472k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072979NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS084156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe decision to undergo genetic testing for familial frontotemporal dementia (fFTD) is challenging and complex. When counseling individuals, clinicians need to know what individuals understand about the type of fFTD for which they may be at elevated risk. Unfortunately, no tools to measure understanding of fFTD exist, and no study has investigated knowledge gain from fFTD genetic counseling.

methodsBefore and after genetic counseling, 42 asymptomatic individuals from fFTD families completed the newly developed fFTD Knowledge Assessment and Psychological Impact Questionnaire (fFTD KAPI-Q), along with affect and mood questionnaires.

resultsGenetic counseling resulted in substantial knowledge gain on the fFTD KAPI-Q (average gain = 40%); those with lower pre-counseling scores gained the most. Negative affect diminished by 11%. Individuals who gained the greatest knowledge demonstrated the greatest reduction in negative affect.

conclusionsGenetic counseling was effective regardless of level of baseline knowledge and has an immediate ameliorative impact on negative affect.

Indexed as

affectfamilial FTD (fFTD)genetic counselingknowledge assessment

Identifiers

PMID34337135
PMCPMC8319661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.