Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34336975›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Prenatal and Early Postnatal Behavioural Programming in Laying Hens, With Possible Implications for the Development of Injurious Pecking.

Elske N De Haas, Ruth C Newberry, Joanne Edgar, Anja B Riber, Inma Estevez, Valentina Ferrante, Carlos E Hernandez, Joergen B Kjaer, Sezen Ozkan, Ivan Dimitrov and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Welfare assessment of turkeys (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  15. The Impact of ProbioticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 10 countries.

Elske N De HaasDivision of Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ruth C NewberryDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Joanne EdgarBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, United Kingdom.
Anja B RiberAarhus University, Department of Animal Science, Tjele, Denmark.
Inma EstevezDepartment of Animal Production, Neiker, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Valentina FerranteDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Carlos E HernandezDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Joergen B KjaerInstitute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Celle, Germany.
Sezen OzkanDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ivan DimitrovAgricultural Institute - Stara Zagora, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
T Bas RodenburgDivision of Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Andrew M JanczakDepartment of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUtrecht University · NLAarhus University · DKEge University · TRFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEIkerbasque · ESSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SETrakia University · BGUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injurious pecking (IP) represents a serious concern for the welfare of laying hens (

Indexed as

behavioural programmingearly life developmentepigeneticsincubationinjurious peckinglaying hen chickenprenatal

Identifiers

PMID34336975
PMCPMC8323009
OpenAlexW3185074317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.