Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34336541›Full record

ArticleJournal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences2020

Key components and contrasts in the nitrogen budget across a US-Canadian transboundary watershed.

Jiajia Lin, Jana E Compton, Chris Clark, Shabtai Bittman, Donna Schwede, Peter S Homann, Peter Kiffney, David Hooper, Gary Bahr, Jill S Baron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiajia LinThe Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE). 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333.ORCID 0000-0002-1493-2832
Jana E ComptonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis OR 97333.ORCID 0000-0001-9833-8664
Chris ClarkWhatcom Conservation District, Lynden, WA.
Shabtai BittmanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, BC, Canada.
Donna SchwedeU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Measurement & Modeling, Research Triangle, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-7880-0548
Peter S HomannDept. of Environmental Sciences, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA.
Peter KiffneyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA.
David HooperDept. of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA.
Gary BahrNatural Resources Assessment, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Olympia, WA.
Jill S BaronU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, CO.ORCID 0000-0002-5902-6251

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Watershed nitrogen (N) budgets provide insights into drivers and solutions for groundwater and surface water N contamination. We constructed a comprehensive N budget for the transboundary Nooksack River Watershed (British Columbia, Canada and Washington, US) using locally-derived data, national statistics and standard parameters. Feed imports for dairy (mainly in the US) and poultry (mainly in Canada) accounted for 30 and 29% of the total N input to the watershed, respectively. Synthetic fertilizer was the next largest source contributing 21% of inputs. Food imports for humans and pets together accounted for 9% of total inputs, lower than atmospheric deposition (10%). N imported by returning salmon representing marine derived nutrients accounted for <0.06 % of total N input. Quantified N export was 80% of total N input, driven by ammonia emission (32% of exports). Animal product export was the second largest output of N (31%) as milk and cattle in the US and poultry products in Canada. Riverine export of N was estimated at 28% of total N export. The commonly used crop nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) metric alone did not provide sufficient information on farming activities but in combination with other criteria such as farm-gate NUE may better represent management efficiency. Agriculture was the primary driver of N inputs to the environment as a result of its regional importance; the N budget information can inform management to minimize N losses. The N budget provides key information for stakeholders across sectors and borders to create environmentally and economically viable and effective solutions.

Indexed as

agricultureammonia emissionland useNitrogen budgetnitrogen use efficiencytransboundary watershed

Identifiers

PMID34336541
PMCPMC8318187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.