ArticleCureus2021
Accuracy of STOP-Bang Questionnaire in Predicting Difficult Mask Ventilation: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Pilot Study of Preoperative Submandibular POCUS to Predict Difficult Mask Ventilation.POCUS journal · 2026Article
- Association between upper airway computed tomography measurement parameters and mask ventilation in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for difficult airway assessment: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Comparison of NoSAS score with STOP-Bang and Berlin scores in predicting difficult airway.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Observational
- Airway management in patients suffering from morbid obesity.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Difficulty with bag-mask ventilation after the induction of general anesthesia and muscle relaxation places the patient at risk for a prolonged period of apnea and hypoxia and thus, at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This study was designed to assess the accuracy of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in predicting difficult mask ventilation (DMV) in patients receiving general anesthesia for elective surgical procedures. Methods It was a prospective cross-sectional, observational study conducted at a university teaching hospital. A total of 530 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were enrolled. STOP-Bang questionnaire was filled at pre-operative anesthesia assessment. Ease or difficulty of mask ventilation was assessed and documented by a senior resident responsible for intraoperative anesthetic management. Results Out of 530 patients, 139 (26.22%) had a STOP-Bang score of ≥ 3, of whom 55 (39.5%) were found to have DMV. Out of 391 patients with a STOP-Bang score of < 3, only 29 patients (7.5%) had DMV (P ≤0.001). Snoring, high blood pressure, BMI more than 35 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.