Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34336405›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2021

Relative performance of customized and universal probe sets in target enrichment: A case study in subtribe Malinae.

Roman Ufimov, Vojtěch Zeisek, Soňa Píšová, William J Baker, Tomáš Fér, Marcela van Loo, Christoph Dobeš, Roswitha Schmickl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phylogeny ofPeerJ · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roman UfimovDepartment of Forest Growth, Silviculture and Genetics Austrian Research Centre for Forests Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8 Vienna 1130 Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9753-5858
Vojtěch ZeisekInstitute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Zámek 1 Průhonice 252 43 Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-9367
Soňa PíšováDepartment of Forest Growth, Silviculture and Genetics Austrian Research Centre for Forests Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8 Vienna 1130 Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-3961
William J BakerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 3AE United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-1831
Tomáš FérDepartment of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Benátská 2 Prague 128 01 Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-3684
Marcela van LooDepartment of Forest Growth, Silviculture and Genetics Austrian Research Centre for Forests Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8 Vienna 1130 Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7176-2967
Christoph DobešDepartment of Forest Growth, Silviculture and Genetics Austrian Research Centre for Forests Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8 Vienna 1130 Austria.
Roswitha SchmicklInstitute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Zámek 1 Průhonice 252 43 Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0632-5143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseCustom probe design for target enrichment in phylogenetics is tedious and often hinders broader phylogenetic synthesis. The universal angiosperm probe set Angiosperms353 may be the solution. Here, we test the relative performance of Angiosperms353 on the Rosaceae subtribe Malinae in comparison with custom probes that we specifically designed for this clade. We then address the impact of bioinformatically altering the performance of Angiosperms353 by replacing the original probe sequences with orthologs extracted from the

methodsTo evaluate the relative performance of these probe sets, we compared the enrichment efficiency, locus recovery, alignment length, proportion of parsimony-informative sites, proportion of potential paralogs, the topology and support of the resulting species trees, and the gene tree discordance.

resultsLocus recovery was highest for our custom Malinae probe set, and replacing the original Angiosperms353 sequences with a DISCUSSION: A custom probe set benefits from data completeness and can be tailored toward the specificities of the project of choice; however, Angiosperms353 was equally as phylogenetically informative as the custom probes. We therefore recommend using both a custom probe set and Angiosperms353 to facilitate large-scale systematic studies, where financially possible.

Indexed as

Angiosperms353customized probe setMalinaetarget enrichmentuniversal probe set

Identifiers

PMID34336405
PMCPMC8312748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.