Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34336398›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2021

The best of both worlds: Combining lineage-specific and universal bait sets in target-enrichment hybridization reactions.

Kasper P Hendriks, Terezie Mandáková, Nikolai M Hay, Elfy Ly, Alex Hooft van Huysduynen, Rubin Tamrakar, Shawn K Thomas, Oscar Toro-Núñez, J Chris Pires, Lachezar A Nikolov and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Toward a phylogenomic classification of magnoliids.American journal of botany · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The evolution of the hypotetraploidFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Kasper P HendriksNaturalis Biodiversity Center Research Group Functional Traits P.O. Box 9517 2300RA Leiden The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-8368
Terezie MandákováCEITEC Masaryk University Brno CZ-625 00 Czech Republic.
Nikolai M HayDepartment of Biology Duke University Durham North Carolina 27708 USA.
Elfy LyNaturalis Biodiversity Center Research Group Functional Traits P.O. Box 9517 2300RA Leiden The Netherlands.
Alex Hooft van HuysduynenNaturalis Biodiversity Center Research Group Functional Traits P.O. Box 9517 2300RA Leiden The Netherlands.
Rubin TamrakarDepartment of Biology New Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico 88001 USA.
Shawn K ThomasDivision of Biological Sciences University of Missouri Columbia Missouri 65211 USA.
Oscar Toro-NúñezDepartamento de Botánica Universidad de Concepción Concepción Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6598-0511
J Chris PiresDivision of Biological Sciences University of Missouri Columbia Missouri 65211 USA.
Lachezar A NikolovDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California 90095 USA.
Marcus A KochCentre for Organismal Studies COS, Biodiversity and Plant Systematics Heidelberg University 69120 Heidelberg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1693-6829
Michael D WindhamDepartment of Biology Duke University Durham North Carolina 27708 USA.
Martin A LysakCEITEC Masaryk University Brno CZ-625 00 Czech Republic.
Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 3AE United Kingdom.
Klaus MummenhoffDepartment of Biology/Botany Osnabrück University Osnabrück 49076 Germany.
William J BakerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 3AE United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-1831
Frederic LensNaturalis Biodiversity Center Research Group Functional Traits P.O. Box 9517 2300RA Leiden The Netherlands.
C Donovan BaileyDepartment of Biology New Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico 88001 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3123-4083
Naturalis Biodiversity Center · NLDuke University · USMasaryk University · CZNew Mexico State University · USRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBUniversity of Missouri · USHeidelberg University · DELeiden University · NLOsnabrück University · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Concepción · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseResearchers adopting target-enrichment approaches often struggle with the decision of whether to use universal or lineage-specific probe sets. To circumvent this quandary, we investigate the efficacy of a simultaneous enrichment by combining universal probes and lineage-specific probes in a single hybridization reaction, to benefit from the qualities of both probe sets with little added cost or effort. METHODS AND

resultsUsing 26 Brassicaceae libraries and standard enrichment protocols, we compare results from three independent data sets. A large average fraction of reads mapping to the Angiosperms353 (24-31%) and Brassicaceae (35-59%) targets resulted in a sizable reconstruction of loci for each target set (x̄ ≥ 70%).

conclusionsHigh levels of enrichment and locus reconstruction for the two target sets demonstrate that the sampling of genomic regions can be easily extended through the combination of probe sets in single enrichment reactions. We hope that these findings will facilitate the production of expanded data sets that answer individual research questions and simultaneously allow wider applications by the research community as a whole.

Indexed as

Brassicaceaecombining probesenrichmentHyb‐Seqphylogenomicsphylogenypopulation biologytarget enrichment

Identifiers

PMID34336398
PMCPMC8312739
OpenAlexW3182841836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.