Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34336377›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2021

A descriptive survey of operating theatre and intensive care unit temperature management of burn patients in the United Kingdom.

Randeep Mullhi, Ian Ewington, Elizabeth Chipp, Tomasz Torlinski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ambient Temperatures in the Burn Operating Room.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2024
    Article
  5. An Overview of Recent Developments in the Management of Burn Injuries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Randeep MullhiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, West Midlands Burns Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK.
Ian EwingtonDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, West Midlands Burns Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK.
Elizabeth ChippWest Midlands Regional Burns Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK.
Tomasz TorlinskiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, West Midlands Burns Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with major burns lose the normal thermoregulatory function of their skin. They exhibit profound changes in metabolism which aim to compensate for the heat loss associated with water loss through burnt skin. Although these changes in physiology are well documented, the optimal methods for temperature management in both the Operating Theatre and Intensive Care Unit are less clear.

methodsWe distributed a survey consisting of 19 questions to all burn units and centres in the United Kingdom with the aim of ascertaining perception of both hypo and hyperthermia, as well as methods used to manage both of these scenarios.

resultsIn the Operating Theatre, most respondents stated that they measured core temperature (82%); either alone (33%) or in conjunction with peripheral temperature (49%). In the Intensive Care Unit, most respondents measured both core and peripheral temperature (67%), with only a small minority not measuring core temperature (13%). Taking into consideration all professional groups, patients were considered hypothermic if their body temperature was less than 36.2°C (+/-0.7°C). On average, a patient was considered hyperthermic if their body temperature was above 38.8°C (+/-0.6°C).

conclusionDifferences in perception between the professional groups surveyed did not reach clinical or statistical significance. In both the Operating Theatre and Intensive Care Unit, hypothermia was most often managed by increasing the ambient room temperature whereas hyperthermia was most often managed by giving paracetamol. As far as we are aware, this is the first study of the management of altered thermoregulation in major burn patients in the United Kingdom.

Indexed as

hypermetabolismhyperthermiahypothermiaMajor burnstemperature management

Identifiers

PMID34336377
PMCPMC8310863
OpenAlexW3191727555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.