Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34336272›Full record

ArticleCardiology research and practice2021

Derivation and Verification of the Relationship between Ablation Index and Baseline Impedance.

Zheng Cai, Sainan Li, Qi Zhang, Chenyuan Wang, Zhen Jin, Ming Fu, Shuai Zhang, Ming Liang, Zulu Wang, Yaling Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zheng CaiPostgraduate Collage, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2784-7303
Sainan LiDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-7869
Qi ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.
Chenyuan WangDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.
Zhen JinDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.
Ming FuDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.
Shuai ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.
Ming LiangDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9828-5504
Zulu WangDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4719-0564
Yaling HanDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the quantitative adjustment of ablation index (AI) under different baseline impedance to achieve similar lesion dimensions.

methods(1) Keeping the AIs relatively constant, the lesion dimensions in different baseline impedances were studied. (2) According to Joule's law,

results(1) Higher baseline impedances were related to smaller lesion dimensions at similar AIs. (2) The lesion dimensions were roughly the same after modulating the baseline impedance and power to keep the electric current relatively constant. The relationship between AI and

conclusionThe lesion depths are negatively correlated with baseline impedance at a certain AI. The relationship between baseline impedance and AI is "ΔAI = (AI

Identifiers

PMID34336272
PMCPMC8289601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.