Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34336183›Full record

ArticleParkinson's disease2021

Action Imagery and Observation in Neurorehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease (ACTION-PD): Development of a User-Informed Home Training Intervention to Improve Functional Hand Movements.

Judith Bek, Paul S Holmes, Chesney E Craig, Zoë C Franklin, Matthew Sullivan, Jordan Webb, Trevor J Crawford, Stefan Vogt, Emma Gowen, Ellen Poliakoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parkinson's disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motor imagery in autism: a systematic review.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Stimulus specificity in combined action observation and motor imagery of typing.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Playing remotely in times of crisis: A program to overcome social isolation.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Judith BekDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-1788
Paul S HolmesHealth, Psychology and Communities Research Centre, Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0821-3580
Chesney E CraigHealth, Psychology and Communities Research Centre, Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9492-1294
Zoë C FranklinResearch Centre for Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6130-8787
Matthew SullivanSchool of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-1342
Jordan WebbDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-5231
Trevor J CrawfordDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-7307
Stefan VogtDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4627-3410
Emma GowenDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4788-4280
Ellen PoliakoffDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4975-7787
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBLancaster University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_16053Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParkinson's disease (PD) causes difficulties with hand movements, which few studies have addressed therapeutically. Training with action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) improves performance in healthy individuals, particularly when the techniques are applied simultaneously (AO + MI). Both AO and MI have shown promising effects in people with PD, but previous studies have only used these separately.

objectiveThis article describes the development and pilot testing of an intervention combining AO + MI and physical practice to improve functional manual actions in people with PD.

methodsThe home-based intervention, delivered using a tablet computer app, was iteratively designed by an interdisciplinary team, including people with PD, and further developed through focus groups and initial field testing. Preliminary data on feasibility were obtained via a six-week pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN 11184024) of 10 participants with mild to moderate PD (6 intervention; 4 treatment as usual). Usage and adherence data were recorded during training, and semistructured interviews were conducted with participants. Exploratory outcome measures included dexterity and timed action performance.

resultsUsage and qualitative data provided preliminary evidence of acceptability and usability. Exploratory outcomes also suggested that subjective and objective performance of manual actions should be tested in a larger trial. The importance of personalisation, choice, and motivation was highlighted, as well as the need to facilitate engagement in motor imagery.

conclusionsThe results indicate that a larger RCT is warranted, and the findings also have broader relevance for the feasibility and development of AO + MI interventions for PD and other conditions.

Identifiers

PMID34336183
PMCPMC8324342
OpenAlexW3181793785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.