Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34335972›Full record

ReviewTheranostics2021

A perspective on the radiopharmaceutical requirements for imaging and therapy of glioblastoma.

Julie Bolcaen, Janke Kleynhans, Shankari Nair, Jeroen Verhoeven, Ingeborg Goethals, Mike Sathekge, Charlot Vandevoorde, Thomas Ebenhan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theranostics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Potential therapeutic targeting of BKMolecular oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Radiopharmaceuticals and their applications in medicine.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  15. Pre-operative dual-time-point [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie BolcaenRadiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa.
Janke KleynhansNuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure NPC, Pretoria, South Africa.
Shankari NairRadiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jeroen VerhoevenLaboratory of Radiopharmacy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ingeborg GoethalsGhent University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghent, Belgium.
Mike SathekgeNuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure NPC, Pretoria, South Africa.
Charlot VandevoordeRadiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa.
Thomas EbenhanNuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure NPC, Pretoria, South Africa.
iThemba Laboratory · ZAGhent University Hospital · BEUniversity of Pretoria · ZASteve Biko Hospital · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous clinical trials and pre-clinical developments, the treatment of glioblastoma (GB) remains a challenge. The current survival rate of GB averages one year, even with an optimal standard of care. However, the future promises efficient patient-tailored treatments, including targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT). Advances in radiopharmaceutical development have unlocked the possibility to assess disease at the molecular level allowing individual diagnosis. This leads to the possibility of choosing a tailored, targeted approach for therapeutic modalities. Therapeutic modalities based on radiopharmaceuticals are an exciting development with great potential to promote a personalised approach to medicine. However, an effective targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) for the treatment of GB entails caveats and requisites. This review provides an overview of existing nuclear imaging and TRT strategies for GB. A critical discussion of the optimal characteristics for new GB targeting therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals and clinical indications are provided. Considerations for target selection are discussed, i.e. specific presence of the target, expression level and pharmacological access to the target, with particular attention to blood-brain barrier crossing. An overview of the most promising radionuclides is given along with a validation of the relevant radiopharmaceuticals and theranostic agents (based on small molecules, peptides and monoclonal antibodies). Moreover, toxicity issues and safety pharmacology aspects will be presented, both in general and for the brain in particular.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaHumansPrecision MedicineRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsglioblastomaPET SPECT imagingradiochemistrytargeted radionuclide therapytheranostics

Identifiers

PMID34335972
PMCPMC8315062
OpenAlexW3183454286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.