Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34335859›Full record

ArticleDrugs and alcohol today2019

Examining cannabis protective behavioral strategy use using multiple methods.

Mark A Prince, Tiffany Jenzer, Whitney Brown, Eleftherios M Hetelekides, Rachel A Mumm, R Lorraine Collins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs and alcohol today, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A PrinceDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Tiffany JenzerUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Whitney BrownResearch Institute on Addictions, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Eleftherios M HetelekidesUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Rachel A MummUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
R Lorraine CollinsUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USColorado State University · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING ON ALCOHOL ETIOLOGY AND TREATMENTT32AA007583 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI Gregory G Homish, Jennifer P Read · 2000 to 2026
$8.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE –: Cannabis use among young adults is increasing, despite being associated with several negative consequences. Protective behavioral strategies (PBSs) are a potential mechanism of behavior change for reducing substance use, yet PBS use for cannabis is not well understood. The purpose of this paper is to further define and measure the PBS construct for cannabis. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH –: A community sample of cannabis users (n = 54) participated in eight focus groups discussing the use of PBSs. Participants completed surveys regarding demographics, cannabis use habits and cannabis problems. The authors also administered an existing measure of cannabis PBS and asked them to generate new or unique protective strategies that they had used or had heard of others using. FINDINGS –: Thematic analysis of qualitative focus group data provided information about cannabis users' reasons for regulating cannabis use (e.g. health or legal problems, interpersonal) as well as strategies to moderate cannabis use or attenuate their risk for experiencing adverse consequences (e.g. distraction, existential/spiritual strategies). Analyses of quantitative survey data revealed that use of PBSs was negatively correlated with cannabis outcomes. Perceived helpfulness of strategies was an important predictor of decreased cannabis use and adverse consequences. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS –: Findings expand the understanding of the definition and measurement of strategies for regulating cannabis use and reducing related risk of experiencing adverse consequences. ORIGINALITY/VALUE –: This is the first study to examine cannabis-related PBS using both qualitative and quantitative methods, which provide insights into the definition of PBS and for future refinements of PBS measurement.

Indexed as

CannabisFocus groupsMarijuanaMulti-method researchProtective behavioural strategiesYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID34335859
PMCPMC8319839
OpenAlexW2921543885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.