Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34335769›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2021

Comparison of the Effect of Four Different Abutment Screw Torques on Screw Loosening in Single Implant-Supported Prosthesis after the Application of Mechanical Loading.

Behnaz Ebadian, Amirhossein Fathi, Saba Khodadad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural and torque changes in implant components of different diameters subjected to mechanical fatigue.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Behnaz EbadianDental Implants Research Center, Dental Research Institue, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Amirhossein FathiDental Material Research Center, Dental Research Institue, Department of Prosthodontics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2415-578X
Saba KhodadadDental Students Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe complications of implant-supported prostheses can be classified into mechanical and biological ones, one part of which is associated with screw loosening. This study was aimed to compare the effect of four different abutment screw torque techniques on screw loosening in single implant-supported prostheses following the application of mechanical loading. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this experimental study, a total of 40 implants in acrylic blocks (6 × 10 × 20 mm) were mounted perpendicular to the surface. They were then randomly divided into four groups: (1) torquing once with 30 Ncm, (2) torquing three times with 30 Ncm and 5-minute intervals, (3) torquing once with 30 Ncm, opening the screw, and retorquing with 30 Ncm, and (4) torquing once with 35 Ncm. The torque values were confirmed by using a digital torque meter. Then, the samples underwent a force (2 cps, 0.453-11.793 kg) for three hours before the measurement of detorque values. The screw loosening force (torque) was then measured and recorded. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS (version 22) software using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test at a 5% error level.

resultsThe maximum mean detorque values of the abutment screws in single implant-supported prostheses were reported for groups 4 (27.8 ± 1.3), 1 (26.8 ± 1.3), and 3 (25.1 ± 1.3), and the minimum mean detorque value was found in group 2 (24.9 ± 1.2). Moreover, no significant difference was observed between groups 2 and 3 (

conclusionThe increase in the torque value increased the torque loss. However, the detorque value in group 4 showed the least difference with the value recommended by the manufacturer (30 Ncm).

Identifiers

PMID34335769
PMCPMC8315865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.