Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34335648›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Genomic Prediction of Resistance to Tar Spot Complex of Maize in Multiple Populations Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing SNPs.

Shiliang Cao, Junqiao Song, Yibing Yuan, Ao Zhang, Jiaojiao Ren, Yubo Liu, Jingtao Qu, Guanghui Hu, Jianguo Zhang, Chunping Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shiliang CaoMaize Research Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Junqiao SongInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.
Yibing YuanInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.
Ao ZhangInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.
Jiaojiao RenInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.
Yubo LiuInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.
Jingtao QuInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.
Guanghui HuMaize Research Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Jianguo ZhangMaize Research Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Chunping WangMaize Research Institute, Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China.
Jingsheng CaoMaize Research Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Michael OlsenInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.
Boddupalli M PrasannaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.
Felix San VicenteInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.
Xuecai ZhangInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tar spot complex (TSC) is one of the most important foliar diseases in tropical maize. TSC resistance could be furtherly improved by implementing marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection (GS) individually, or by implementing them stepwise. Implementation of GS requires a profound understanding of factors affecting genomic prediction accuracy. In the present study, an association-mapping panel and three doubled haploid populations, genotyped with genotyping-by-sequencing, were used to estimate the effectiveness of GS for improving TSC resistance. When the training and prediction sets were independent, moderate-to-high prediction accuracies were achieved across populations by using the training sets with broader genetic diversity, or in pairwise populations having closer genetic relationships. A collection of inbred lines with broader genetic diversity could be used as a permanent training set for TSC improvement, which can be updated by adding more phenotyped lines having closer genetic relationships with the prediction set. The prediction accuracies estimated with a few significantly associated SNPs were moderate-to-high, and continuously increased as more significantly associated SNPs were included. It confirmed that TSC resistance could be furtherly improved by implementing GS for selecting multiple stable genomic regions simultaneously, or by implementing MAS and GS stepwise. The factors of marker density, marker quality, and heterozygosity rate of samples had minor effects on the estimation of the genomic prediction accuracy. The training set size, the genetic relationship between training and prediction sets, phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the training sets, and incorporating known trait-marker associations played more important roles in improving prediction accuracy. The result of the present study provides insight into less complex trait improvement via GS in maize.

Indexed as

genomic predictiongenomic selectiongenotyping-by sequencingmaizeprediction accuracytar spot complex

Identifiers

PMID34335648
PMCPMC8322742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.