ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021
Prediction of Second Language Proficiency Based on Electroencephalographic Signals Measured While Listening to Natural Speech.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Event-related brain activity in response to partners' speech in natural conversation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Differential electroencephalography responses in speech perception between native and non-native speakers.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Brainwave patterns during a mock job interview among Thai undergraduate students.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Expert-Novice Level Classification Using Graph Convolutional Network Introducing Confidence-Aware Node-Level Attention Mechanism.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effects and prediction of cognitive load on encoding model of brain response to auditory and linguistic stimuli in educational multimedia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impact of depressed state on attention and language processing during news broadcasts: EEG analysis and machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- P300 as a neural indicator for setting levels of goal scores in educational gamification applications from the perspective of intrinsic motivation: An ERP study.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2022Article
- Test-retest reliability analysis of resting-state EEG measures and their association with long-term memory in children and adults.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study had two goals: to clarify the relationship between electroencephalographic (EEG) features estimated while non-native speakers listened to a second language (L2) and their proficiency in L2 determined by a conventional paper test and to provide a predictive model for L2 proficiency based on EEG features. We measured EEG signals from 205 native Japanese speakers, who varied widely in English proficiency while they listened to natural speech in English. Following the EEG measurement, they completed a conventional English listening test for Japanese speakers. We estimated multivariate temporal response functions separately for word class, speech rate, word position, and parts of speech. We found significant negative correlations between listening score and 17 EEG features, which included peak latency of early components (corresponding to N1 and P2) for both open and closed class words and peak latency and amplitude of a late component (corresponding to N400) for open class words. On the basis of the EEG features, we generated a predictive model for Japanese speakers' English listening proficiency. The correlation coefficient between the true and predicted listening scores was 0.51. Our results suggest that L2 or foreign language ability can be assessed using neural signatures measured while listening to natural speech, without the need of a conventional paper test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.